Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: Implement HAVE_LIVEPATCH

On 10:15 Thu 20 Mar     , Song Liu wrote:
> This is largely based on [1] by Suraj Jitindar Singh.
> 
> Test coverage:
> 
> - Passed manual tests with samples/livepatch.
> - Passed all but test-kprobe.sh in selftests/livepatch.
>   test-kprobe.sh is expected to fail, because arm64 doesn't have
>   KPROBES_ON_FTRACE.
> - Passed tests with kpatch-build [2]. (This version includes commits that
>   are not merged to upstream kpatch yet).
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> [2] https://github.com/liu-song-6/kpatch/tree/fb-6.13
> Cc: Suraj Jitindar Singh <[email protected]>
> Cc: Torsten Duwe <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                   | 3 +++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 4 +++-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c     | 4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 31d5e1ee6089..dbd237b13b21 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ config ARM64
>  	select USER_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
>  	select VDSO_GETRANDOM
>  	select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
> +	select HAVE_LIVEPATCH
>  	help
>  	  ARM 64-bit (AArch64) Linux support.
>  
> @@ -2501,3 +2502,5 @@ endmenu # "CPU Power Management"
>  source "drivers/acpi/Kconfig"
>  
>  source "arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig"
> +
> +source "kernel/livepatch/Kconfig"
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 1114c1c3300a..4ac42e13032b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void);
>  #define TIF_UPROBE		4	/* uprobe breakpoint or singlestep */
>  #define TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT	5	/* MTE Asynchronous Tag Check Fault */
>  #define TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL	6	/* signal notifications exist */
> +#define TIF_PATCH_PENDING	7	/* pending live patching update */
>  #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE	8	/* syscall trace active */
>  #define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT	9	/* syscall auditing */
>  #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT	10	/* syscall tracepoint for ftrace */
> @@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void);
>  #define _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT	(1 << TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)
>  #define _TIF_SECCOMP		(1 << TIF_SECCOMP)
>  #define _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU	(1 << TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)
> +#define _TIF_PATCH_PENDING	(1 << TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
>  #define _TIF_UPROBE		(1 << TIF_UPROBE)
>  #define _TIF_SINGLESTEP		(1 << TIF_SINGLESTEP)
>  #define _TIF_32BIT		(1 << TIF_32BIT)
> @@ -103,7 +105,7 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void);
>  #define _TIF_WORK_MASK		(_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_SIGPENDING | \
>  				 _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE | \
>  				 _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT | \
> -				 _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
> +				 _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL | _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
>  
>  #define _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK	(_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | \
>  				 _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT | _TIF_SECCOMP | \
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> index b260ddc4d3e9..b537af333b42 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>  #include <linux/context_tracking.h>
>  #include <linux/kasan.h>
>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
> +#include <linux/livepatch.h>
>  #include <linux/lockdep.h>
>  #include <linux/ptrace.h>
>  #include <linux/resume_user_mode.h>
> @@ -144,6 +145,9 @@ static void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long thread_flags)
>  				       (void __user *)NULL, current);
>  		}
>  
> +		if (thread_flags & _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
> +			klp_update_patch_state(current);
> +
>  		if (thread_flags & (_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
>  			do_signal(regs);
>  
> -- 
> 2.47.1
> 

Tested-by: Andrea della Porta <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Andrea