Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Mark Brown <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:07:49 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-toolchains,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 10:53:13AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > IMNSHO the whole sframe effort is misguided because all the major ISAs do have > shadow stack hardware support now which is generally a better option. > It would be better to invest effort in deploying that widely. It's going to take a *considerable* time for the hardware support to become standard.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmkDqXQACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AA6wf/fPlJ3ZZiRfquQVNzY+ew+cYxeWDCikXzsRlhgaI9QtgyOYuqap9kP6Zm Q4GtCiSdQlhesTLSCDYlzA47oPaU/kIsqMM2oWFLQpG86P42wcU50nK1pM2xDd03 CTIKCwXaPg9g85BBDJImlUNR4AObyB+aWrVm5zY+ryjFjxgwTWJq+c4Z4BBqvgwq rBnJIqGYd4gBOSqEq+YoCER52rFc4/o1w5M3huTTXOGDewIOPhEhIIvcUxfk59T5 X+vYoD6cShQP3g4Av2eXzkvp6gaEtql6rlQfwd1sXRRBHpWzVxTlWJlOL8udq2iV h2fPSgo3sJ/5rwWlavKPjnCpFCN3xg== =8uFa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----