Re: Concerns about SFrame viability for userspace stack walking
Mark Brown <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Oct 2025 11:46:25 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-toolchains,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 07:57:25PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 11:31:38AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Not on x86 at least. All my x86 systems have it, except for a few old > > skylakes. > About half of my systems have CET, but I just checked, none of them > seem to actually use userspace shadow stacks. > AFAICT Debian hasn't build their packages with this stuff on. It hasn't - they're starting to roll it out now in the development distro, an actual release is a couple of years away at this point.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmkEoZAACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Dsrgf8C2XPXL0I7OVWPeVC8p9yzGl1Ezfjci16TbgBUEOu3fZ87e595HqvTmQr jFMLXBBIR7h5X99LeYr874y/C2wR0ZX7+4cnJb7spb3XLJFD0IdcZAxRaE6EVOHJ KMvNUWvLIfv2Ryv3vahTfWPG6BRPlWca7whA9IxTu+vXQbv7QU4/Bm9b7IdGxnGQ KzBJpNEwyxskJstK7ldQEX2w1a0JDwNBV6BOvsrvzRio6ttPxzJRi4+hiuKB6rUh F2QyIkTrs/7c/BMI8DMsOnq2grcLn1hdbYTgr3KGlgbpgwEMQViob7uGKbAWZ1MY 0SUf7LAgAZQWk7Q2kAMGf7/N1kYpSQ== =JAkR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----