Re: [PATCH] libtracecmd: Fix continuing in tracecmd_iterate_events_reverse()
"MOESSBAUER, Felix" <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Nov 2025 09:10:06 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 2025-11-21 at 12:09 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <[email protected]> > > When a callback from tracecmd_iterate_events_reverse() returns non-zero it > cause the function to exit out early. Calling tracecmd_iterate_events_reverse() > again with cont=true, is supposed to restart where it left off. But > because of the way the reverse traverses all the events on a page, by > calling tracecmd_read_data() to find the next task, it does not pick the > next task. It can pick the next task at the start of the page. > > If the callback back causes the function to exit out early, record the > page_offset of the last record read, and then set the cursor back to that > event. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > > Fixes: 56cbc522518a5 ("trace-cmd library: Add tracecmd_iterate_events_reverse() API") > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]> > --- > lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c b/lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c > index afdbd2aa98b6..8dfeff458485 100644 > --- a/lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c > +++ b/lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c > @@ -3036,6 +3036,7 @@ int tracecmd_iterate_events_reverse(struct tracecmd_input *handle, > void *callback_data, bool cont) > { > unsigned long long last_timestamp = 0; > + unsigned long long page_offset = 0; > struct tep_record **records; > struct tep_record *record; > int next_cpu; > @@ -3072,6 +3073,8 @@ int tracecmd_iterate_events_reverse(struct tracecmd_input *handle, > record = next_last_event(handle, records, next_cpu);; > ret = call_callbacks(handle, record, next_cpu, > callback, callback_data); > + if (ret) > + page_offset = record->offset; > tracecmd_free_record(record); > } > } while (next_cpu >= 0 && ret == 0); > @@ -3079,6 +3082,17 @@ int tracecmd_iterate_events_reverse(struct tracecmd_input *handle, > free_last_events(handle, records, cpus, cpu_size, max_cpus); > free(records); > > + /* > + * If the callback exited out early, then set the cursor back > + * to the location of that record so that if this gets called > + * again with cont = true, it will continue where it left off. > + */ > + if (page_offset) { > + /* Set the record to the previous record that was read */ > + record = tracecmd_read_at(handle, page_offset - 4, NULL); Hi, where does the magic "- 4" come from? > + tracecmd_free_record(record); I still don't get why this fixes the issue. Does tracecmd_read_at has a side-effect to set the the internal cursor? If so, it IMHO would help to document this side effect in tracecmd_read_at(). Felix > + } > + > return ret; > } > > -- > 2.51.0 -- Siemens AG Linux Expert Center Friedrich-Ludwig-Bauer-Str. 3 85748 Garching, Germany