Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] `ring_buffer_alloc_read_page()` returning a cached page with an obsolete order causes `tracing_buffers_read()` to permanently return EOF to userspace.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v5 03/10] ring-buffer: Make cpu_buffer::free_page a buffer_data_read_page ---
commit 19f06657067d8dbcf108f6bacc6885d031739166
Author: Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]>
ring-buffer: Make cpu_buffer::free_page a buffer_data_read_page
This commit changes the free_page cache to store the page order alongside
the page address. This fixes a mismatch when a cached reader page is
discarded after a concurrent ring buffer resize changes the global
subbuf_order.
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index ec4f5a0c93e85..b6fa258aafe2c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -6962,9 +6962,9 @@ ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
> local_irq_save(flags);
> arch_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
>
> - if (cpu_buffer->free_page) {
> - bpage->data = cpu_buffer->free_page;
> - cpu_buffer->free_page = NULL;
> + if (cpu_buffer->free_page.data) {
> + *bpage = cpu_buffer->free_page;
> + cpu_buffer->free_page.data = NULL;
[Severity: High]
Does this struct assignment cause tracing_buffers_read() to permanently
return EOF to userspace during a concurrent resize?
When a resize happens in ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(),
buffer->subbuf_order is updated first:
buffer->subbuf_order = order;
/* Make sure all new buffers are allocated, before deleting... */
for_each_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu) {
This opens a large race window before cpu_buffer->free_page.data is
cleared for each CPU.
If a user reads from trace_pipe_raw during this window,
ring_buffer_alloc_read_page() allocates bpage and initially sets
bpage->order to the new buffer->subbuf_order. However, the struct
assignment *bpage = cpu_buffer->free_page copies the old free_page,
overwriting bpage->order with the old order.
Later in tracing_buffers_read(), the caller caches this mismatched page
and sets spare_size to the new size:
} else {
info->spare_cpu = iter->cpu_file;
info->spare_size = page_size;
}
Because the orders don't match, ring_buffer_read_page() rejects the page:
if (data_page->order != buffer->subbuf_order)
return -1;
This returns -1, which tracing_buffers_read() treats as EOF. Subsequent
reads see info->spare_size == page_size, reuse the bad page, and
permanently return EOF.
> }
>
> arch_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=3
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.