Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] tracing: Fix subbuf resize races with trace_pipe_raw readers
Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 09:31:53PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 14:11:48 +0100 > Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]> wrote: > > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c > > index a00ab8a9cbd0..83292d90599e 100644 > > --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c > > +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c > > @@ -6976,34 +6976,52 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_swap_cpu); > > * ring_buffer_alloc_read_page - allocate a page to read from buffer > > * @buffer: the buffer to allocate for. > > * @cpu: the cpu buffer to allocate. > > + * @prev: The previous page to be repurposed (can be NULL). > > * > > - * This function is used in conjunction with ring_buffer_read_page. > > + * This function is used in conjunction with ring_buffer_read_page(). > > * When reading a full page from the ring buffer, these functions > > * can be used to speed up the process. The calling function should > > * allocate a few pages first with this function. Then when it > > * needs to get pages from the ring buffer, it passes the result > > - * of this function into ring_buffer_read_page, which will swap > > + * of this function into ring_buffer_read_page(), which will swap > > * the page that was allocated, with the read page of the buffer. > > * > > + * If @prev is provided, and it has a different order than the current > > + * subbuffer order, its payload will be freed and re-allocated. If it > > + * already matches the order, it is simply returned. > > + * > > * Returns: > > * The page allocated, or ERR_PTR > > */ > > -struct buffer_data_read_page * > > -ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu) > > +struct buffer_data_read_page *ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, > > + struct buffer_data_read_page *prev) > > I think we should do this differently. I don't like the "prev" argument. > Instead, let's pass by address. > > int ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, struct buffer_data_read_page **rpage) > > ack. > > > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c > > index 395238b2b715..f9399f391ac6 100644 > > --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c > > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c > > @@ -7080,8 +7080,8 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf, > > { > > struct ftrace_buffer_info *info = filp->private_data; > > struct trace_iterator *iter = &info->iter; > > - void *trace_data; > > - int page_size; > > + void *trace_data, *prev_spare; > > + unsigned int spare_size; > > ssize_t ret = 0; > > ssize_t size; > > > > @@ -7091,36 +7091,30 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf, > > if (iter->snapshot && tracer_uses_snapshot(iter->tr->current_trace)) > > return -EBUSY; > > > > - page_size = ring_buffer_subbuf_size_get(iter->array_buffer->buffer); > > +again: > > > > + prev_spare = info->spare; > > + if (prev_spare) { > > + spare_size = ring_buffer_read_page_size(info->spare); > > > > - /* Make sure the spare matches the current sub buffer size */ > > - if (info->spare) { > > - if (page_size != info->spare_size) { > > - ring_buffer_free_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer, > > - info->spare_cpu, info->spare); > > - info->spare = NULL; > > - } > > + /* Do we have previous read data to read? */ > > + if (info->read < spare_size) > > + goto read; > > } > > > > - if (!info->spare) { > > - info->spare = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer, > > - iter->cpu_file); > > - if (IS_ERR(info->spare)) { > > - ret = PTR_ERR(info->spare); > > - info->spare = NULL; > > - } else { > > - info->spare_cpu = iter->cpu_file; > > - info->spare_size = page_size; > > - } > > - } > > - if (!info->spare) > > + /* Make sure the read page order is aligned with the current buffer subbuf order */ > > + info->spare = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file, > > + prev_spare); > > + if (IS_ERR(info->spare)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(info->spare); > > + info->spare = NULL; > > + ring_buffer_free_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer, info->spare_cpu, prev_spare); > > return ret; > > + } > > > instead of the above: > > ret = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file, > &info->space); > > Where the above could do (under lock): > > if (*rpage) { > if (*rpage)->order == buffer->subbuf_order) > return 0; > ring_buffer_free_read_page(*rpage); > *rpage = NULL; > } > > *rpage = all the reader page; > > That is, lets completely remove the responsibility of the user having to > keep track of the buffer order here. > > > > > - /* Do we have previous read data to read? */ > > - if (info->read < page_size) > > - goto read; > > + spare_size = ring_buffer_read_page_size(info->spare); > > + info->read = spare_size; > > + info->spare_cpu = iter->cpu_file; > > > > - again: > > trace_access_lock(iter->cpu_file); > > ret = ring_buffer_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer, > > info->spare, > > And if we could make ring_buffer_read_page() return -EAGAIN if the spare is > not the proper order. And only for that case. Sounds good. -- Vincent > > > > @@ -7129,6 +7123,10 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf, > > trace_access_unlock(iter->cpu_file); > > > > if (ret < 0) { > > + /* Did we race with ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set ? */ > > + if (spare_size != ring_buffer_subbuf_size_get(iter->array_buffer->buffer)) > > + goto again; > > Then here we can just have: > > if (ret == -EAGAIN) > goto again; > > -- Steve > > > > + > > if (trace_empty(iter) && !iter->closed) { > > if (update_last_data_if_empty(iter->tr)) > > return 0; > > @@ -7142,12 +7140,14 @@ ssize_t tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf, > > > > goto again; > > } > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > info->read = 0; > > + > > read: > > - size = page_size - info->read; > > + size = spare_size - info->read; > > if (size > count) > > size = count; > > trace_data = ring_buffer_read_page_data(info->spare);