[PATCH] tracing: Fix use-after-free in trace_pipe read on sub-buffer order change

Deepanshu Kartikey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Writing to buffer_subbuf_size_kb calls ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(),
which frees every sub-buffer of the ring buffer, including the reader
page, and replaces them with newly allocated ones.

Readers of trace_pipe hold pointers into those pages. ring_buffer_peek()
looks up an event under cpu_buffer->reader_lock but returns the event
pointer after dropping the lock, and peek_next_entry() then calls
ring_buffer_event_length() and ring_buffer_event_data() on it. If the
sub-buffer order is changed in that window, the reader dereferences
freed memory:

  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ring_buffer_peek+0x3e0/0x430
  Read of size 1 at addr ffff88802a4cf010 by task syz-executor989/6002

  Freed by:
   free_buffer_page kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:398 [inline]
   ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set+0x1325/0x18e0 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:7444
   buffer_subbuf_size_write+0x182/0x280 kernel/trace/trace.c:8221

Take trace_access_lock(RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) around the order change.
This is the lock trace_pipe readers already hold across their entire
peek-and-print loop, so the swap can no longer race with a reader that
is dereferencing a peeked event.

Fixes: f9b94daa542a ("ring-buffer: Set new size of the ring buffer sub page")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=685955db58555575fdd2
Tested-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 395238b2b715..c38a5de602e0 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -8214,6 +8214,8 @@ buffer_subbuf_size_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 	/* Do not allow tracing while changing the order of the ring buffer */
 	tracing_stop_tr(tr);
 
+	trace_access_lock(RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS);
+
 	old_order = ring_buffer_subbuf_order_get(tr->array_buffer.buffer);
 	if (old_order == order)
 		goto out;
@@ -8253,6 +8255,7 @@ buffer_subbuf_size_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 #endif
 	(*ppos)++;
  out:
+	trace_access_unlock(RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS);
 	if (ret)
 		cnt = ret;
 	tracing_start_tr(tr);
-- 
2.43.0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.