Re: Wrong Perf Backtraces

Hi,
Thanks. Still no change. Sorry, I forgot to say that you should 
initialize the "perfCMD" variable to your perf binary path.
Regards.

On 2020-03-29 15:49, Jiri Olsa wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 05:46:57AM +0430, ahmadkhorrami wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> Each line is correct. I mean addresses match symbols. But some callers 
>> and
>> callees do not match. Perhaps callchain misses some callers in 
>> between.
>> Regards
> 
> right, I missed another case.. how about the change below?
> your script is silent now on my data
> 
> jirka
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel_fprintf.c 
> b/tools/perf/util/evsel_fprintf.c
> index 3b4842840db0..fc4fb88937ed 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel_fprintf.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel_fprintf.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,8 @@ int sample__fprintf_callchain(struct perf_sample 
> *sample, int left_alignment,
> 
> if (print_srcline)
> printed += map__fprintf_srcline(map, addr, "\n  ", fp);
> +            else if (node->srcline)
> +                printed += fprintf(fp, " %s", node->srcline);
> 
> if (sym && sym->inlined)
> printed += fprintf(fp, " (inlined)");