Re: Wrong Perf Backtraces

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 05:13:00PM +0430, ahmadkhorrami wrote:
> Hi,
> Please confirm my thought in the previous email, if it is correct.
> Regards.
> On 2020-03-30 23:35, ahmadkhorrami wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > Sorry, I did not pay attention to the fact that we need debug info to be
> > able to decode the callchain. So, without complete debug info the
> > backtrace (either the symbols or the addresses) is bogus. But you say
> > that the backtrace portions containing binaries with full debug info are
> > OK. Am I right? Please confirm if this is the case.
> > If so, these portions may be enough for my current usecase.

you need debuginfo to resolve symbols and inlines,
raw addresses should be coorect

jirka