[PATCH v3 09/19] ovl: stop using lookup_one() in iterate_shared() handling.

NeilBrown <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-unionfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-efi,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>

lookup_one() is expected to be removed as it does not fit well with
proposed changes to directory locking.
Specifically d_alloc_parallel() will be ordered outside of i_rwsem
and as iterate_shared() is called with i_rwsem held it is not safe
to call d_alloc_parallel().

We can instead call d_alloc_noblock() and then call the ->lookup, but
that can fail if there is a lookup attempt concurrent with the
readdir().

ovl cannot afford for the lookup to fail as that could produce incorrect
results, and it cannot safely drop i_rwsem temporarily and that could
introduce races with handling of the directory cache.

Instead we rely on the fact that ovl_iterate() has an exclusive lock on
the directory, so any concurrent lookup will wait for the ovl_iterate()
call to complete.  We allocate a separate dentry and if the lookup is
successful, it is hashed with the result.

When the concurrent lookup gets i_rwsem it mustn't do its own lookup -
it must use the existing dentry.  This is found, if it exists, using
try_lookup_noperm().

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
---
 fs/overlayfs/namei.c   | 12 ++++++++++++
 fs/overlayfs/readdir.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/namei.c b/fs/overlayfs/namei.c
index ca899fdfaafd..69032eb2b1e2 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/namei.c
@@ -1385,6 +1385,7 @@ struct dentry *ovl_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
 	struct ovl_fs *ofs = OVL_FS(dentry->d_sb);
 	struct ovl_entry *poe = OVL_E(dentry->d_parent);
 	bool check_redirect = (ovl_redirect_follow(ofs) || ofs->numdatalayer);
+	struct dentry *alias;
 	int err;
 	struct ovl_lookup_ctx ctx = {
 		.dentry = dentry,
@@ -1399,6 +1400,17 @@ struct dentry *ovl_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
 	if (dentry->d_name.len > ofs->namelen)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENAMETOOLONG);
 
+	/*
+	 * The existance of this in-lookup dentry might have forced
+	 * readdir to do the lookup with a new dentry.  If so we must
+	 * return that one.
+	 */
+	alias = try_lookup_noperm(&QSTR_LEN(dentry->d_name.name,
+					    dentry->d_name.len),
+				  dentry->d_parent);
+	if (alias && !IS_ERR(alias))
+		return alias;
+
 	with_ovl_creds(dentry->d_sb)
 		err = ovl_lookup_layers(&ctx, &d);
 
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c b/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c
index 1dcc75b3a90f..e03b32491941 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/readdir.c
@@ -574,8 +574,28 @@ static int ovl_cache_update(const struct path *path, struct ovl_cache_entry *p,
 		}
 	}
 	/* This checks also for xwhiteouts */
-	this = lookup_one(mnt_idmap(path->mnt), &QSTR_LEN(p->name, p->len), dir);
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(this) || !this->d_inode) {
+	this = d_alloc_noblock(dir, &QSTR_LEN(p->name, p->len));
+	if (this == ERR_PTR(-EWOULDBLOCK)) {
+		/*
+		 * Some other thead is looking up this name and will
+		 * block on i_rwsem before it can complete the lookup.
+		 * We will do the lookup in a new dentry and when that
+		 * lookup gets a turn it will find and return this
+		 * dentry.
+		 */
+		this = d_alloc_name(dir, p->name);
+	}
+	if (!IS_ERR(this) && !d_unhashed(this)) {
+		/* Either we got an in-lookup or we made our own unhashed */
+		struct dentry *alias = ovl_lookup(dir->d_inode, this, 0);
+
+		if (alias) {
+			d_lookup_done(this);
+			dput(this);
+			this = alias;
+		}
+	}
+	if (IS_ERR(this) || !this->d_inode) {
 		/* Mark a stale entry */
 		p->is_whiteout = true;
 		if (IS_ERR(this)) {
-- 
2.50.0.107.gf914562f5916.dirty
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.