Re: [RFC PATCH] ovl: keep merged and impure readdir caches separate

Nirmoy Das <[email protected]> Tue, 12 May 2026 20:27:43 +0200
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-unionfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Amir,

On 11.05.26 23:54, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Hi Nirmoy,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 8:21 AM Nirmoy Das <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Overlayfs uses one inode cache slot for two readdir cache users with
>> different lifetime rules. Merged directory iteration pins the cache from
>> open directory files with cache->refcount. Impure real-directory iteration
>> uses the inode cache as an unrefcounted lookup table.
>>
>> Those caches cannot be reused interchangeably. If merged iteration finds
>> an impure cache in the inode slot, it can pin and seek through a cache
>> that was not built for merged iteration. If impure iteration finds a merged
>> cache, it can walk an object whose lifetime is controlled by open directory
>> files. Either direction can leave ovl_iterate() using stale cache entries.
>>
>> Add ovl_dir_cache_drop() to detach the inode cache before freeing it. Keep
>> refcounted merged caches alive until ovl_cache_put(), stop publishing new
>> merged caches through the inode slot,
> This is unacceptable - invalidating merged dir cache to paper over
> another root bug, which was not really fixed.
>
>> and let impure iteration reuse only
>> unrefcounted caches.
> All those guards are nice, but how does a directory inode change from
> being merged to impure or vice versa?
> This should never happen.
>
> It took a lot of arguing with Sonnet about wrong leads to find the real bug.
>
> Real bug was introduced by:
> b79e05aaa1667 ("ovl: no direct iteration for dir with origin xattr")
>
> It changed the test from:
>
> od->is_real = !OVL_TYPE_MERGE(type);
> od->is_upper = OVL_TYPE_UPPER(type);
>
> to:
>
> od->is_real = !ovl_test_flag(OVL_WHITEOUTS, d_inode(dir));
> od->is_upper = OVL_TYPE_UPPER(type);
>
> But there is a race window in copy up of a directory where
> upper is set and published before the OVL_WHITEOUTS flag
> is set.
>
> an opendir() observing this state inside the race window will
> wrongly start to iterate_real and another opendir later will
> observe the flag and start iterate_merged - boom!
>
> Attached is what I think is a correct fix.
> WDYT?

This looks correct with my limited understanding of the overlay code. I 
still see the issue when running with

the syzkaller-derived C reproducer in a loop inside an arm64 virtme/qemu 
VM with a KASAN/debug kernel.


Let me try to debug it more and get back.

Regards,

Nirmoy

>
> Thanks,
> Amir.