Re: [PATCH] ovl: Allow changing default fsync_mode
Gao Xiang <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Jun 2026 11:17:28 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-unionfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On 2026/6/24 10:30, Yafang Shao wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 10:28 AM Gao Xiang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2026/6/24 10:09, Yafang Shao wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 10:52 PM Amir Goldstein <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 3:47 PM Gao Xiang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> >>> Since the "volatile" option has been working fine for over a year >>> across our large fleet of Kubernetes production servers, I submitted >>> this change to upstream. In Kubernetes environments, there is no use >>> case for remounting the workdir to the same directory, so the volatile >>> file won't cause any issues — which is why the "volatile" setting has >>> been working well there. >> That is not an excuse to introduce such new incompatible behavior >> to the linux upstream starting only for your customized fleet and >> bother every single opensource user/application to adapt this >> behavior which uses overlayfs now. >> >> If you insist to work on a breaking change, please gather >> userspace feedback boardly first. >> >> And here I just say you and your employer are lucky since I >> know it's also risky even on the generic kubernate perspective. >> Please just maintain your livepatch downstream, thanks. >> >> No need to reply, and I won't reply this either, it's just >> waste of my time to explain a basic upstream principle again >> and again. > > I'll just go ahead and redirect you to /dev/null ;) The whole thread is: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/[email protected]/T/#u Personally, I feel offensive due to Yafang's expression written above. I keep maintain my replies in technical discussion, but the replies above already include the following words: "No wonder containerd is getting harder and harder to use ;)" "Please do your homework." "Again, pls do your homework." and the emotional texts `;)` make me feel uneasy over the time, especially the final words "I'll just go ahead and redirect you to /dev/null ;)" So I write an email as a public report to the CoC since I'm not sure how to proceed to comment the community patches because I could get offence as a result. Thanks, Gao Xiang