Re: [PATCH stable/linux-5.10.y 0/7] Backport Fix incorrect overlayfs mmap() and mprotect() LSM access controls

Amir Goldstein <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Jun 2026 13:01:43 +0200

Newsgroups	org.kernel.vger.linux-unionfs,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-security-module,org.kernel.vger.selinux,org.kernel.vger.stable
Message-ID	<CAOQ4uxh4-LYt8VUW5o+0mMrHpnZm3t8k4WD6x2kRqEj=_ZpLOA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 5:06=E2=80=AFAM Cai Xinchen <[email protected]=
> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your reply. Regarding the two points of feedback:
>
> First, 6.1 is still in the process of being adapted.

So do not propose for 5.10 please.

>
> Second, this patch set is primarily intended to fix CVE-2026-46054, but
> it seems that for lower versions to implement SELinux checks for overlay
> mmap/mprotect checks, some dependencies are unavoidable. In such cases,
> should we add more tests to reduce the risk and integrate the changes,
> or should we simply not fix this issue? If more tests are needed, are
> there any recommended test suites?

I have concerns.
The burdn of proof is on you.

Thanks,
Amir.