[Bug 221806] New: Right-side USB-A port fails SuperSpeed link training on Lenovo Thi nkPad X13 Gen 5 (Meteor Lake, xhci_hcd 8086:7 e7d) — works on Fedora 6.19.300, fails on 6 .18.39 and 7.1.4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221806
Bug ID: 221806
Summary: Right-side USB-A port fails SuperSpeed link training
on Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 5 (Meteor Lake, xhci_hcd
8086:7e7d) — works on Fedora 6.19.300, fails on
6.18.39 and 7.1.4
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Hardware: Intel
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: USB
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
Regression: No
Hardware:
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 5 (21LVS3U900), Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (Meteor Lake)
USB controller: Intel Corporation Meteor Lake-P USB 3.2 Gen 2x1 xHCI Host
Controller [8086:7e7d] (rev 20), driver xhci_hcd
Problem:
The right-side USB-A port (physical_location panel=right; USB2 companion
port bus3/port5, SuperSpeed port bus4/port1, both on the same 00:14.0
xHCI controller alongside the internal camera/fingerprint reader/Bluetooth,
which work fine) fails to enumerate any device. Left-side USB-A and both
USB-C ports work normally.
Confirmed NOT a hardware fault: the exact same USB drive works reliably,
repeatedly, on a Fedora 44 LiveCD (kernel 6.19.300) in the same port.
Kernel versions tested on NixOS (vanilla/mainline builds via nixpkgs), both
fail identically:
- 6.18.39 (nixpkgs linuxPackages, i.e. an older stable branch)
- 7.1.4 (nixpkgs linuxPackages_latest)
Symptom (with xhci_hcd/xhci_pci dynamic debug enabled):
xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Port change event, 3-5, id 5, portsc: 0x20ae1
xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: handle_port_status: starting usb3 port polling.
xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 3-5 read: 0x20ae1, return 0x10301
xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: clear port5 connect change, portsc: 0xae1
xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 3-5 read: 0xae1, return 0x301
xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Port change event, 3-5, id 5, portsc: 0x202a0
xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: handle_port_status: starting usb3 port polling.
xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 3-5 read: 0x202a0, return 0x10100
xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: clear port5 connect change, portsc: 0x2a0
xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Get port status 3-5 read: 0x2a0, return 0x100
[... repeated Get port status 0x2a0 ...]
xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: xhci_hub_status_data: stopping usb3 port polling
Interpretation: on connect, CCS (connect status) briefly goes to 1 with
link state "Polling" (SuperSpeed link training in progress), then within
~2.3ms drops back to CCS=0 with link state "RxDetect". The kernel retries
polling for ~130ms then gives up. This sequence is 100% deterministic and
reproducible — identical portsc values and timing on every attempt, across
both kernel versions above.
Things ruled out during troubleshooting:
- Not a loose/mechanical connection: laptop stationary, port physically
fine, confirmed reliable on Fedora LiveCD with many repeated
plug/unplug cycles.
- Not device-level USB autosuspend: usbcore.autosuspend=-1 kernel param
set and confirmed active (/sys/module/usbcore/parameters/autosuspend = -1).
- Not USB roothub runtime PM: forced power/control=on on both usb3 and
usb4 roothubs, no change.
- Not PCIe ASPM: forced pcie_aspm policy to "performance", no change,
identical portsc trace.
- Not PCI device runtime PM: 0000:00:14.0 power/runtime_status was
"active" throughout.
- thinkpad_acpi loads and initializes normally; no ACPI errors in dmesg
around boot or around the 00:14.0 device.
- boltctl / bolt (Thunderbolt security) not relevant — this is a plain
USB2/USB3 port on the classic xHCI controller (00:14.0), not the
USB4/Thunderbolt controller (00:0d.x).
Requesting help identifying what Fedora's kernel build (6.19.300, likely
with Red Hat/Fedora-specific patches or a different xhci_pci
config/quirk) does differently that allows this port to work, versus a
vanilla/mainline kernel build of both an older (6.18.39) and much newer
(7.1.4) version, which fail identically.
Happy to test patches or provide additional logs (full dmesg, lspci -vvv,
port_status via debugfs, etc.) on request.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.