Re: [PATCH 3/3] watchdog: qcom: Register pretimeout interrupt as NMI
Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:56:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-watchdog,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/30/26 11:32 PM, Mayank Rungta via B4 Relay wrote: > From: Mayank Rungta <[email protected]> > > When a system is completely unresponsive due to an interrupt storm or > deadlocked CPU cores with standard interrupts disabled, a standard watchdog > pretimeout bark interrupt will fail to execute, preventing the pretimeout > governor from capturing CPU backtraces before the hardware reset bite. [...] > drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c > index 49bd04841f0c..19d8e91cff40 100644 > --- a/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c > @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ struct qcom_wdt { > unsigned long rate; > void __iomem *base; > const u32 *layout; > + int irq; > + bool is_nmi; > + bool irq_enabled; Do we need to track this? I think we can rely on the framework NOPing out multiple ops->start requests Konrad