RE: [PATCH rtw-next v6 2/3] wifi: rtw88: rtw8822c: Convert DAC IQ calibration path to signed math
Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arsenii Pashchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > Convert the temporary stack arrays 'iv' and 'qv' from u32 to s32. > Update all internal function signatures to accept s32 pointers and > handle signed values natively. > > Use sign_extend32() combined with FIELD_GET() to properly interpret > the 10-bit hardware values as signed integers. Forgot to update commit message as FIELD_GET_SIGNED()... > This allows flattening > the complex nested unsigned boundary conditions in > rtw8822c_dac_iq_check() into a simple amplitude boundary check. Ensure > rtw8822c_dac_iq_offset() properly maps the signed average back to a > 10-bit unsigned format expected by the hardware registers. > > Signed-off-by: Arsenii Pashchenko <[email protected]> > --- [...] > @@ -207,30 +172,16 @@ static void rtw8822c_dac_iq_sort(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u32 *iv, u32 *qv) > } > } > > -static void rtw8822c_dac_iq_offset(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u32 *vec, u32 *val) > +static u32 rtw8822c_dac_iq_offset(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, s32 *vec) > { > - u32 p, m, t, i; > + s32 sum = 0; > > - m = 0; > - p = 0; > - for (i = 10; i < DACK_SN_8822C - 10; i++) { > - if (vec[i] > 0x200) > - m = (0x400 - vec[i]) + m; > - else > - p = vec[i] + p; > - } > + for (u32 i = 10; i < DACK_SN_8822C - 10; i++) > + sum += vec[i]; > > - if (p > m) { > - t = p - m; > - t = t / (DACK_SN_8822C - 20); > - } else { > - t = m - p; > - t = t / (DACK_SN_8822C - 20); > - if (t != 0x0) > - t = 0x400 - t; > - } > + s32 avg = sum / (DACK_SN_8822C - 20); No declaration in the middle. > > - *val = t; > + return avg >= 0 ? (u32)avg : (u32)(0x400 + avg); Maybe, we can give an example to understand easier, like avg = -1, return 0x3FF. (signed 10 bits value) > } > > static u32 rtw8822c_get_path_write_addr(u8 path) > @@ -271,20 +222,18 @@ static u32 rtw8822c_get_path_read_addr(u8 path) > return base_addr; > } > > -static bool rtw8822c_dac_iq_check(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u32 value) > +static bool rtw8822c_dac_iq_check(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, s32 value) > { > - bool ret = true; > > - if ((value >= 0x200 && (0x400 - value) > 0x64) || > - (value < 0x200 && value > 0x64)) { > - ret = false; > + if (value > 100 || value < -100) { > rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_RFK, "[DACK] Error overflow\n"); > + return false; > } > > - return ret; > + return true; > } > > -static void rtw8822c_dac_cal_iq_sample(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u32 *iv, u32 *qv) > +static void rtw8822c_dac_cal_iq_sample(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, s32 *iv, s32 *qv) > { > u32 temp; > int i = 0, cnt = 0; > @@ -292,8 +241,8 @@ static void rtw8822c_dac_cal_iq_sample(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u32 *iv, u32 *qv) > while (i < DACK_SN_8822C && cnt < 10000) { > cnt++; > temp = rtw_read32(rtwdev, 0x2dbc); > - iv[i] = FIELD_GET(RTW8822C_DAC_IV_MASK, temp); > - qv[i] = FIELD_GET(RTW8822C_DAC_QV_MASK, temp); > + iv[i] = FIELD_GET_SIGNED(RTW8822C_DAC_IV_MASK, temp); > + qv[i] = FIELD_GET_SIGNED(RTW8822C_DAC_QV_MASK, temp); > > if (rtw8822c_dac_iq_check(rtwdev, iv[i]) && > rtw8822c_dac_iq_check(rtwdev, qv[i])) > @@ -302,67 +251,63 @@ static void rtw8822c_dac_cal_iq_sample(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u32 *iv, u32 *qv) > } > > static void rtw8822c_dac_cal_iq_search(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, > - u32 *iv, u32 *qv, > + s32 *iv, s32 *qv, > u32 *i_value, u32 *q_value) > { > - u32 i_max = 0, q_max = 0, i_min = 0, q_min = 0; > + s32 i_max = 0, q_max = 0, i_min = 0, q_min = 0; > u32 i_delta, q_delta; > u32 temp; > - int i, cnt = 0; > + u32 i, cnt = 0; Why did you need changing 'int' to 'u32'? > > do { > i_min = iv[0]; > i_max = iv[0]; > q_min = qv[0]; > q_max = qv[0]; > - for (i = 0; i < DACK_SN_8822C; i++) { > - rtw8822c_rf_minmax_cmp(rtwdev, iv[i], &i_min, &i_max); > - rtw8822c_rf_minmax_cmp(rtwdev, qv[i], &q_min, &q_max); > + for (i = 1; i < DACK_SN_8822C; i++) { > + if (iv[i] < i_min) > + i_min = iv[i]; > + if (iv[i] > i_max) > + i_max = iv[i]; > + if (qv[i] < q_min) > + q_min = qv[i]; > + if (qv[i] > q_max) > + q_max = qv[i]; > } > > - if (i_max < 0x200 && i_min < 0x200) > - i_delta = i_max - i_min; > - else if (i_max >= 0x200 && i_min >= 0x200) > - i_delta = i_max - i_min; > - else > - i_delta = i_max + (0x400 - i_min); > + i_delta = i_max - i_min; > + q_delta = q_max - q_min; > > - if (q_max < 0x200 && q_min < 0x200) > - q_delta = q_max - q_min; > - else if (q_max >= 0x200 && q_min >= 0x200) > - q_delta = q_max - q_min; > - else > - q_delta = q_max + (0x400 - q_min); > > rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_RFK, > - "[DACK] i: min=0x%08x, max=0x%08x, delta=0x%08x\n", > + "[DACK] i: min=%d, max=%d, delta=%d\n", > i_min, i_max, i_delta); > rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_RFK, > - "[DACK] q: min=0x%08x, max=0x%08x, delta=0x%08x\n", > + "[DACK] q: min=%d, max=%d, delta=%d", > q_min, q_max, q_delta); > > rtw8822c_dac_iq_sort(rtwdev, iv, qv); > > if (i_delta > 5 || q_delta > 5) { > temp = rtw_read32(rtwdev, 0x2dbc); > - iv[0] = FIELD_GET(RTW8822C_DAC_IV_MASK, temp); > - qv[0] = FIELD_GET(RTW8822C_DAC_QV_MASK, temp); > + iv[0] = FIELD_GET_SIGNED(RTW8822C_DAC_IV_MASK, temp); > + qv[0] = FIELD_GET_SIGNED(RTW8822C_DAC_QV_MASK, temp); > temp = rtw_read32(rtwdev, 0x2dbc); > - iv[DACK_SN_8822C - 1] = FIELD_GET(RTW8822C_DAC_IV_MASK, temp); > - qv[DACK_SN_8822C - 1] = FIELD_GET(RTW8822C_DAC_QV_MASK, temp); > + iv[DACK_SN_8822C - 1] = FIELD_GET_SIGNED(RTW8822C_DAC_IV_MASK, temp); > + qv[DACK_SN_8822C - 1] = FIELD_GET_SIGNED(RTW8822C_DAC_QV_MASK, temp); > } else { > break; > } > } while (cnt++ < 100); > > - rtw8822c_dac_iq_offset(rtwdev, iv, i_value); > - rtw8822c_dac_iq_offset(rtwdev, qv, q_value); > + *i_value = rtw8822c_dac_iq_offset(rtwdev, iv); > + *q_value = rtw8822c_dac_iq_offset(rtwdev, qv); > } > > static void rtw8822c_dac_cal_rf_mode(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, > u32 *i_value, u32 *q_value) > { > - u32 iv[DACK_SN_8822C], qv[DACK_SN_8822C]; > + s32 iv[DACK_SN_8822C], qv[DACK_SN_8822C]; > u32 rf_a, rf_b; > > rf_a = rtw_read_rf(rtwdev, RF_PATH_A, 0x0, RFREG_MASK); > -- > 2.55.0