[PATCH rtw-next 10/14] wifi: rtw89: 8922d: correct selection of CCK rate circuit

The RTL8922D has single one shared CCK rate circuit. When operating on
0+2 mode, the selection should be on RTW89_PHY_1. For 1+1 operating mode,
select RTW89_PHY_1 only if PHY0 isn't on 2GHz band but PHY1 does.

Also, change the operating mode of debugging value from decimal to
hexadecimal to be easier to read.

Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.c     | 2 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922d.c | 5 +++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.c
index 6f11335b4968..99b52ca05fe2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.c
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static void rtw89_entity_recalc_mlo_dbcc_mode(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
 	mode = rtw89_entity_sel_mlo_dbcc_mode(rtwdev, active_hws);
 	rtwdev->mlo_dbcc_mode = mode;
 
-	rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_STATE, "recalc mlo dbcc mode to %d\n", mode);
+	rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_STATE, "recalc mlo dbcc mode to 0x%x\n", mode);
 }
 
 static void rtw89_entity_recalc_mgnt_roles(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922d.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922d.c
index 287a9476bb77..75297b39c4d7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922d.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922d.c
@@ -2471,14 +2471,15 @@ static int rtw8922d_ctrl_mlo(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_mlo_dbcc_mode
 		rtw89_write32_mask(rtwdev, reg1, B_BBWRAP_ELMSR_EN_BE4, 0);
 	} else if (mode == MLO_0_PLUS_2_1RF) {
 		rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_SYS_DBCC_BE4,
-				       B_SYS_DBCC_24G_BAND_SEL_BE4, RTW89_PHY_0);
+				       B_SYS_DBCC_24G_BAND_SEL_BE4, RTW89_PHY_1);
 		rtw89_write32_mask(rtwdev, reg0, B_BBWRAP_ELMSR_EN_BE4, 0);
 		rtw89_write32_mask(rtwdev, reg1, B_BBWRAP_ELMSR_EN_BE4, 0);
 	} else if ((mode == MLO_1_PLUS_1_1RF) || (mode == DBCC_LEGACY)) {
 		struct rtw89_entity_conf conf;
 
 		rtw89_entity_get_conf(rtwdev, &conf);
-		cck_phy_idx = conf.chans[1]->band_type == RTW89_BAND_2G ?
+		cck_phy_idx = conf.chans[0]->band_type != RTW89_BAND_2G &&
+			      conf.chans[1]->band_type == RTW89_BAND_2G ?
 			      RTW89_PHY_1 : RTW89_PHY_0;
 
 		rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_SYS_DBCC_BE4,
-- 
2.25.1