Re: [PATCH] mac802154_hwsim: allow users to specify the number of simulated radios dinamically instead of the previously hardcoded value of 2

Ok! Just a last question:

Shouldn't we define a maximum number of supported radios when using
unsigned? A value like -1 would wrap around and result in thousands of
radios, right?
That said, wouldn't it be simpler and safer to just use int instead?


Em sáb., 7 de jun. de 2025 às 16:22, Andrew Lunn <[email protected]> escreveu:
>
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 02:54:57PM -0300, Ramon Fontes wrote:
> > > handle as unsigned then this check would not be necessary?
> >
> > Yeah, it does make sense. However, I have a bit of an embarrassing
> > question. How do I submit an updated patch in this same thread?
>
> You don't. You should submit a new patchset, as a new thread.
>
> The CI tooling works on one patchset per thread, and if you deviate
> from that, the CI won't test it. And if it is not tested, it is pretty
> much an automatic reject.
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
>
> It is also the merge windows right now, so anything you post will get
> rejected anyway, so please post as RFC.
>
>         Andrew