[PATCH v2 4/4] ax.25: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array

Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-x25,dev.linux.lists.bridge,dev.linux.lists.mptcp,org.kernel.vger.dccp,org.kernel.vger.linux-hams,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-rdma,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-sctp,org.kernel.vger.linux-wpan,org.kernel.vger.lvs-devel,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.netfilter-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
From: Joel Granados via B4 Relay <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:40:05 +0100
> This commit comes at the tail end of a greater effort to remove the
> empty elements at the end of the ctl_table arrays (sentinels) which will
> reduce the overall build time size of the kernel and run time memory
> bloat by ~64 bytes per sentinel (further information Link :
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZO5Yx5JFogGi%[email protected]/)
> 
> When we remove the sentinel from ax25_param_table a buffer overflow
> shows its ugly head. The sentinel's data element used to be changed when
> CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE was not defined.

I think it's better to define the relation explicitly between the
enum and sysctl table by BUILD_BUG_ON() in ax25_register_dev_sysctl()

  BUILD_BUG_ON(AX25_MAX_VALUES != ARRAY_SIZE(ax25_param_table));

and guard AX25_VALUES_DS_TIMEOUT with #ifdef CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE
as done for other enum.


> This did not have any adverse
> effects as we still stopped on the sentinel because of its null
> procname. But now that we do not have the sentinel element, we are
> careful to check ax25_param_table's size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Granados <[email protected]>
> ---
>  net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c b/net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c
> index db66e11e7fe8..e55be8817a1e 100644
> --- a/net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c
> +++ b/net/ax25/sysctl_net_ax25.c
> @@ -141,8 +141,6 @@ static const struct ctl_table ax25_param_table[] = {
>  		.extra2		= &max_ds_timeout
>  	},
>  #endif
> -
> -	{ }	/* that's all, folks! */
>  };
>  
>  int ax25_register_dev_sysctl(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
> @@ -155,7 +153,7 @@ int ax25_register_dev_sysctl(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
>  	if (!table)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	for (k = 0; k < AX25_MAX_VALUES; k++)
> +	for (k = 0; k < AX25_MAX_VALUES && k < ARRAY_SIZE(ax25_param_table); k++)
>  		table[k].data = &ax25_dev->values[k];
>  
>  	snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "net/ax25/%s", ax25_dev->dev->name);
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.