Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ax.25: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array

Joel Granados <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-x25,dev.linux.lists.bridge,dev.linux.lists.mptcp,org.kernel.vger.dccp,org.kernel.vger.linux-hams,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-rdma,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-sctp,org.kernel.vger.linux-wpan,org.kernel.vger.lvs-devel,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.netfilter-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 12:49:34PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> From: Joel Granados via B4 Relay <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:40:05 +0100
> > This commit comes at the tail end of a greater effort to remove the
> > empty elements at the end of the ctl_table arrays (sentinels) which will
> > reduce the overall build time size of the kernel and run time memory
> > bloat by ~64 bytes per sentinel (further information Link :
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZO5Yx5JFogGi%[email protected]/)
> > 
> > When we remove the sentinel from ax25_param_table a buffer overflow
> > shows its ugly head. The sentinel's data element used to be changed when
> > CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE was not defined.
> 
> I think it's better to define the relation explicitly between the
> enum and sysctl table by BUILD_BUG_ON() in ax25_register_dev_sysctl()
> 
>   BUILD_BUG_ON(AX25_MAX_VALUES != ARRAY_SIZE(ax25_param_table));
> 
> and guard AX25_VALUES_DS_TIMEOUT with #ifdef CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE
> as done for other enum.

When I remove AX25_VALUES_DS_TIMEOUT from the un-guarded build it
complains in net/ax25/ax25_ds_timer.c (ax25_ds_set_timer). Here is the
report https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/.

How best to address this? Should we just guard the whole function and do
nothing when not set? like this:

```
void ax25_ds_set_timer(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
{
#ifdef COFNIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE
        if (ax25_dev == NULL)        ···/* paranoia */
                return;

        ax25_dev->dama.slave_timeout =
                msecs_to_jiffies(ax25_dev->values[AX25_VALUES_DS_TIMEOUT]) / 10;
        mod_timer(&ax25_dev->dama.slave_timer, jiffies + HZ);
#else
        return;
#endif
}

```

I'm not too familiar with this, so pointing me to the "correct" way to
handle this would be helpfull.

Thx in advance.

Best

-- 

Joel Granados
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 659 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Yv9S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.