Re: [PATCH 6/6] xfs: don't zap bmbt forks if they are MAXLEVELS tall
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:07:30PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]> > > LOLLM noticed a discrepancy between the bmbt level checks in the libxfs > bmbt code vs. the inode repair code. We do actually allow a bmbt root > that proclaims to have a height of XFS_BM_MAXLEVELS. Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> I guess we need a test that actually creates such a deep tree. But we'll probably run out space / extents before..