Re: [PATCHSET 2/2] xfs: LLM-inspired bug fixes, part 2

Carlos Maiolino <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kernel.vger.stable
Message-ID <178453787385.7428.13090168411944119051.b4-ty@b4>
On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 23:04:02 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Here's a second batch of xfs fixes resulting from a LLaMma.  Mwa mwa
> mwa...
> 
> If you're going to start using this code, I strongly recommend pulling
> from my git trees, which are linked below.
> 
> With a bit of luck, this should all go splendidly.
> Comments and questions are, as always, welcome.
> 
> [...]

Applied to for-next, thanks!

[1/6] xfs: set xfarray killable sort correctly
      commit: 540ddc626245f12f56326ee0c1601f71ebb41d64
[2/6] xfs: fix off-by-one error when calling xchk_xref_has_rt_owner
      commit: 5d72a68f2007ba2a968d6bf47dba3f4620bd182e
[3/6] xfs: handle non-inode owners for rtrmap record checking
      commit: 353a5900bc85234e7df05caac37698042dc26348
[4/6] xfs: fully check the parent handle when it points to the rootdir
      commit: ba150ce63453ccd74bae1404c1dfedbd01ecfd55
[5/6] xfs: clamp timestamp nanoseconds correctly
      commit: 15e38a9366b31d3d61081ead115f1dff59379e24
[6/6] xfs: don't zap bmbt forks if they are MAXLEVELS tall
      commit: 59c462b0f5cfa107794228051724b34ae9334168

Best regards,
-- 
Carlos Maiolino <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.