Re: improve log context annotations

"Darrick J. Wong" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs
Message-ID <20260721152348.GY7380@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 05:01:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 11:16:40AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > Thanks. Those all look good for me. But I'm adding Dave to the thread as
> > he has much more expertise with lockdep than me and I'd appreciate his
> > input.
> 
> More review is always good.  But as a reminder for the audience:
> lockdep and the lock context annotations are two totally seaprate
> things.  The former verifies the locking state at runtime, while
> the latter is about compile-time enforcement for the cases where
> that is possible.

<shrug> The new annotations are consistent with my understanding of the
annotated functions, but as I don't build with clang I can't say I've
actually dug into its auto-verifier features, let alone run it.

--D
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.