[PATCH 04/12] xfs: remove spurious XBF_DONE clearing on readahead validation failure

Both callers of ->verify_read already do this, so don't duplicate the
flag manipulation.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <[email protected]>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dquot_buf.c |  8 +++-----
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dquot_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dquot_buf.c
index f960474bed3d..77954d1d924c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dquot_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dquot_buf.c
@@ -252,8 +252,8 @@ xfs_dquot_buf_read_verify(
 /*
  * readahead errors are silent and simply leave the buffer as !done so a real
  * read will then be run with the xfs_dquot_buf_ops verifier. See
- * xfs_inode_buf_verify() for why we use EIO and ~XBF_DONE here rather than
- * reporting the failure.
+ * xfs_inode_buf_verify() for why we use EIO here rather than reporting the
+ * failure.
  */
 static void
 xfs_dquot_buf_readahead_verify(
@@ -262,10 +262,8 @@ xfs_dquot_buf_readahead_verify(
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = bp->b_mount;
 
 	if (!xfs_dquot_buf_verify_crc(mp, bp, true) ||
-	    xfs_dquot_buf_verify(mp, bp, true) != NULL) {
+	    xfs_dquot_buf_verify(mp, bp, true) != NULL)
 		xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, -EIO);
-		bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_DONE;
-	}
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
index 336ef843f2fe..e4c3f7b24e95 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
@@ -29,12 +29,14 @@
  * has not had the inode cores stamped into it. Hence for readahead, the buffer
  * may be potentially invalid.
  *
- * If the readahead buffer is invalid, we need to mark it with an error and
- * clear the DONE status of the buffer so that a followup read will re-read it
- * from disk. We don't report the error otherwise to avoid warnings during log
- * recovery and we don't get unnecessary panics on debug kernels. We use EIO here
- * because all we want to do is say readahead failed; there is no-one to report
- * the error to, so this will distinguish it from a non-ra verifier failure.
+ * If the readahead buffer is invalid, we need to mark it with an error so that a
+ * followup read will re-read it from disk.
+ *
+ * We don't report the error otherwise to avoid warnings during log recovery and
+ * we don't get unnecessary panics on debug kernels.  Use EIO here because all
+ * we want to do is say readahead failed; there is no-one to report the error
+ * to, so this will distinguish it from a non-ra verifier failure.
+ *
  * Changes to this readahead error behaviour also need to be reflected in
  * xfs_dquot_buf_readahead_verify().
  */
@@ -64,7 +66,6 @@ xfs_inode_buf_verify(
 		if (unlikely(!di_ok ||
 				XFS_TEST_ERROR(mp, XFS_ERRTAG_ITOBP_INOTOBP))) {
 			if (readahead) {
-				bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_DONE;
 				xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, -EIO);
 				return;
 			}
-- 
2.53.0