Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: count folio alloc'd xfs_buf items in NR_KERNEL_MISC_RECLAIMABLE

Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 03:40:53PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> xfs_buf allocations via xfs_buf_alloc_folio are actually reclaimable,
> but are not accounted for as such. NR_KERNEL_MISC_RECLAIMABLE seems
> made for this purpose, although AFAICT there are no users today.
> 
> To achieve this, add a new flag _XBF_PAGES to track what we have
> allocated this way, increment the NR_KERNEL_MISC_RECLAIMABLE
> count when we do, and then do the reverse when they are freed.

I don't see why we'd need the flag.  All buffers are either allocated
using vmalloc, kmalloc or as folios.  So it should always be set for
folio allocations (and is misnamed since it now covers folios as well).

> 
> These allocations now show up under nr_kernel_misc_reclaimable in
> /proc/vmstat when allocations are active, which in turn makes
> MemAvailable more accurate in /proc/meminfo.

Adding linux-mm and a few people that touched this counter for
opinions.  I guess the counter is only for full folios, and we
should not set it for the small than page kmalloc allocations?
But even with that, why not set it for the vmalloc allocations?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 2e00a33ebb62..0a853ec361d0 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -114,8 +114,15 @@ xfs_buf_free(
>  		vfree(bp->b_addr);
>  	else if (bp->b_flags & _XBF_KMEM)
>  		kfree(bp->b_addr);
> -	else if (bp->b_addr)
> -		folio_put(virt_to_folio(bp->b_addr));
> +	else if (bp->b_addr) {
> +		struct folio *folio = virt_to_folio(bp->b_addr);
> +
> +		if (bp->b_flags & _XBF_PAGES)
> +			mod_node_page_state(folio_pgdat(folio),
> +					NR_KERNEL_MISC_RECLAIMABLE,
> +					-folio_nr_pages(folio));
> +		folio_put(folio);
> +	}
>  
>  	call_rcu(&bp->b_rcu, xfs_buf_free_callback);
>  }
> @@ -132,6 +139,9 @@ xfs_buf_alloc_folio(
>  	if (!folio)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	bp->b_addr = folio_address(folio);
> +	bp->b_flags |= _XBF_PAGES;
> +	mod_node_page_state(folio_pgdat(folio), NR_KERNEL_MISC_RECLAIMABLE,
> +			folio_nr_pages(folio));
>  	trace_xfs_buf_backing_folio(bp, _RET_IP_);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -427,7 +437,7 @@ xfs_buf_find_lock(
>  			return -ENOENT;
>  		}
>  		ASSERT((bp->b_flags & _XBF_DELWRI_Q) == 0);
> -		bp->b_flags &= _XBF_KMEM;
> +		bp->b_flags &= (_XBF_PAGES | _XBF_KMEM);
>  		bp->b_ops = NULL;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> index 79cc9c3f0254..ba7bfafe67b6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct xfs_buf;
>  #define _XBF_LOGRECOVERY (1u << 18)/* log recovery buffer */
>  
>  /* flags used only internally */
> +#define _XBF_PAGES	 (1u << 20)/* backed by folio/page allocator */
>  #define _XBF_KMEM	 (1u << 21)/* backed by heap memory */
>  #define _XBF_DELWRI_Q	 (1u << 22)/* buffer on a delwri queue */
>  
> @@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ typedef unsigned int xfs_buf_flags_t;
>  	{ XBF_STALE,		"STALE" }, \
>  	{ XBF_WRITE_FAIL,	"WRITE_FAIL" }, \
>  	{ _XBF_LOGRECOVERY,	"LOG_RECOVERY" }, \
> +	{ _XBF_PAGES,		"PAGES" }, \
>  	{ _XBF_KMEM,		"KMEM" }, \
>  	{ _XBF_DELWRI_Q,	"DELWRI_Q" }, \
>  	/* The following interface flags should never be set */ \
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 
> 
---end quoted text---
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.