Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] scripts/sorttable: Handle RISC-V patchable ftrace entries

On Wed, 3 Jun 2026 10:10:44 +0800
Shuai Xue <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's a pure comment cosmetic, not worth a respin on its own. But for the

I don't know. I've respinned for better comments before.

> rest of the feedback on this series (the frame-record metadata contract
> in patch 2 and the dead state->regs field / Call Trace output change in
> patch 6) are the ones actually worth a new version.
> 
> Just to get the routing straight: are you planning to pick this one up
> through the tracing tree on its own?
> 
> It feels like a good candidate for that -- it's an independent
> regression fix (Fixes: 0ca1724b56af) that breaks *all* RISC-V dynamic
> ftrace, not just livepatch, so it shouldn't have to wait on the rest of
> the livepatch series.

As it affects RISCV and I don't have a RISCV to test, I would feel more
comfortable with it going through a RISCV tree that can test the patch.

Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

-- Steve