Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] LoongArch: Mark special sections for KLP support
Joe Lawrence <[email protected]> Wed, 1 Jul 2026 19:06:58 -0400
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.live-patching,dev.linux.lists.llvm,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 06:08:46PM +0800, George Guo wrote: > From: George Guo <[email protected]> > > objtool needs to split the kernel's special sections into per-entry > symbols when generating livepatch modules. Mark them so it can: > > - .altinstructions and __ex_table are read-only, so set an explicit > entry size via SHF_MERGE (ALT_INSTR_SIZE / EXTABLE_SIZE). > > - __bug_table and __jump_table are writable. SHF_MERGE cannot be > combined with SHF_WRITE (Clang rejects it), so annotate each entry > with ANNOTATE_DATA_SPECIAL instead, mirroring x86/arm64. > > Co-developed-by: Kexin Liu <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Kexin Liu <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: George Guo <[email protected]> > --- Hi George, Disclaimer: I don't have LoongArch hardware, so the best I can do with this patchset is to read and poke at it with (cross) compilation. For the special sections, said cross compiler (loongarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 15.2.1 20250808 (Red Hat Cross 15.2.1-1)) is interesting as it appears to emit relocs in special sections (__ex_table, .altinstructions, __bug_table, __jump_table) that point to local assembler labels in the function's text section rather than the section symbol + offset. An example gcc / loongarch .rela__ex_table section looks like: Relocation section '.rela__ex_table' at offset 0x6a28 contains 10 entries: Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend 0000000000000000 0000005d00000063 R_LARCH_32_PCREL 00000000000011f0 .L1^B4 + 0 0000000000000004 0000005e00000063 R_LARCH_32_PCREL 00000000000011f4 .L2^B1 + 0 [ ... snip ... ] Unlike everywhere else ... llvm / loongarch: Relocation section '.rela__ex_table' at offset 0x5710 contains 10 entries: Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend 0000000000000000 0000000200000063 R_LARCH_32_PCREL 0000000000000000 .text + 2a70 0000000000000004 0000000200000063 R_LARCH_32_PCREL 0000000000000000 .text + 2a74 gcc / x86: Relocation section '.rela__ex_table' at offset 0x40f50 contains 2 entries: Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend 0000000000000000 0000000200000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 .text + 1596 0000000000000004 0000000200000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 .text + 159b llvm / x86: Relocation section '.rela__ex_table' at offset 0x343d8 contains 2 entries: Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend 0000000000000000 0000000200000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 .text + 231a 0000000000000004 0000000200000002 R_X86_64_PC32 0000000000000000 .text + 231f gcc / aarch64: Relocation section '.rela__ex_table' at offset 0x448c8 contains 10 entries: Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend 0000000000000000 0000000200000105 R_AARCH64_PREL32 0000000000000000 .text + 24bc 0000000000000004 0000000200000105 R_AARCH64_PREL32 0000000000000000 .text + 2524 [ ... snip ... ] llvm / aarch64 Relocation section '.rela__ex_table' at offset 0x37760 contains 10 entries: Offset Info Type Symbol's Value Symbol's Name + Addend 0000000000000000 0000000200000105 R_AARCH64_PREL32 0000000000000000 .text + 2730 0000000000000004 0000000200000105 R_AARCH64_PREL32 0000000000000000 .text + 264c [ ... snip ... ] The objtool/klp-diff.c implications is that convert_reloc_secsym_to_sym() doesn't handle such non-section symbol relocs in special sections: if (!is_sec_sym(sym)) return 0; That early return leaves the reloc pointing at a .L* symbol that is never cloned into the output livepatch object. When clone_special_section() later calls should_keep_special_sym() to decide whether to include each table entry, it cannot map the reloc to an included function and silently drops it. In the __ex_table case above, the patched function's entries are missing from the .ko. As far as I can tell, this problem applies to other special sections (like .altinstructions, etc.) as well. If not GCC / GAS is to be supported, then klp-diff will need to handle this alternate relocation format. Perhaps these could be pre-converted in convert_reloc_secsym_to_sym() to the general form (func_sym + (label_offset - func_offset)) that is expected? I don't know if that's enough to keep everything hanging together, but might be a place to start. -- Joe