Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 00/33] timers: Use timer_shutdown*() before freeing timers
Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.lvs-devel,dev.linux.lists.bridge,dev.linux.lists.drbd-dev,dev.linux.lists.linux-staging,org.alsa-project.alsa-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-bluetooth,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-edac,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-input,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-leds,org.kernel.vger.linux-media,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-nilfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-parisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kernel.vger.linux-sh,org.kernel.vger.linux-usb,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.netfilter-devel,org.kernel.vger.rcu,org.osuosl.intel-wired-lan |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 12:22:32 -0700 Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote: > Unfortunately the renaming caused some symbol conflicts. > > Global definition: timer_shutdown > > File Line > 0 time.c 93 static inline void timer_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *evt) > 1 arm_arch_timer.c 690 static __always_inline int timer_shutdown(const int access, > 2 timer-fttmr010.c 105 int (*timer_shutdown)(struct clock_event_device *evt); > 3 timer-sp804.c 158 static inline void timer_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *evt) > 4 timer.h 239 static inline int timer_shutdown(struct timer_list *timer) $ git grep '\btimer_shutdown' arch/arm/mach-spear/time.c:static inline void timer_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *evt) arch/arm/mach-spear/time.c: timer_shutdown(evt); arch/arm/mach-spear/time.c: timer_shutdown(evt); arch/arm/mach-spear/time.c: timer_shutdown(evt); drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c:static __always_inline int timer_shutdown(const int access, drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c: return timer_shutdown(ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_ACCESS, clk); drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c: return timer_shutdown(ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_ACCESS, clk); drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c: return timer_shutdown(ARCH_TIMER_MEM_VIRT_ACCESS, clk); drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c: return timer_shutdown(ARCH_TIMER_MEM_PHYS_ACCESS, clk); drivers/clocksource/timer-fttmr010.c: int (*timer_shutdown)(struct clock_event_device *evt); drivers/clocksource/timer-fttmr010.c: fttmr010->timer_shutdown(evt); drivers/clocksource/timer-fttmr010.c: fttmr010->timer_shutdown(evt); drivers/clocksource/timer-fttmr010.c: fttmr010->timer_shutdown(evt); drivers/clocksource/timer-fttmr010.c: fttmr010->timer_shutdown = ast2600_timer_shutdown; drivers/clocksource/timer-fttmr010.c: fttmr010->timer_shutdown = fttmr010_timer_shutdown; drivers/clocksource/timer-fttmr010.c: fttmr010->clkevt.set_state_shutdown = fttmr010->timer_shutdown; drivers/clocksource/timer-fttmr010.c: fttmr010->clkevt.tick_resume = fttmr010->timer_shutdown; drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c:static inline void timer_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *evt) drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c: timer_shutdown(evt); drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c: timer_shutdown(evt); Honestly, I think these need to be renamed, as "timer_shutdown()" should be specific to the timer code, and not individual timers. I'll start making a patch set that starts by renaming these timers, then adds the timer_shutdown() API, and finished with the trivial updates, and that will be a real "PATCH" (non RFC). Linus, should I also add any patches that has already been acked by the respective maintainer? -- Steve