Re: [PATCH] treewide: Convert del_timer*() to timer_shutdown*()
Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.lvs-devel,dev.linux.lists.bridge,dev.linux.lists.drbd-dev,dev.linux.lists.linux-staging,org.alsa-project.alsa-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-bluetooth,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-input,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-leds,org.kernel.vger.linux-media,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-nilfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kernel.vger.linux-sh,org.kernel.vger.linux-usb,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.netfilter-devel,org.osuosl.intel-wired-lan |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 13:45:19 -0500 Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > [ > Linus, > > I ran the script against your latest master branch: > commit b6bb9676f2165d518b35ba3bea5f1fcfc0d969bf > > As the timer_shutdown*() code is now in your tree, I figured > we can start doing the conversions. At least add the trivial ones > now as Thomas suggested that this gets applied at the end of the > merge window, to avoid conflicts with linux-next during the > development cycle. I can wait to Friday to run it again, and > resubmit. > > What is the best way to handle this? > ] Note, I just did a git remote update, checked out the latest, re-ran the script, and this patch hasn't changed. -- Steve