Re: [PATCH] ipvs: change ip_vs_conn_tab_bits range to [8,31]

Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.lvs-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.netfilter-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
	Hello,

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:

> Hi Simon, Andrea and Julian,
> 
> I really appreciate you taking the time to respond to my patch. Some follow up
> questions that I'll appreciate a response for.
> 
> @Simon Horman
> >In any case, I think this patch is an improvement on the current situation.
> 
> +1 to this. I wanted to add that, we're not changing the defaults
> here, the default still stays at 2^12. If a kernel user changes the
> default, they probably already know what the limitations are, so I
> personally don't think it is a big concern.
> 
> @Andrea Claudi
> >for the record, RHEL ships with CONFIG_IP_VS_TAB_BITS set to 12 as
> default.
> 
> Sorry, I should have been clearer. RHEL ships with the same default,
> yes, but it doesn't have the range check, at least, on the version I'm
> using right now (3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7.x86_64).
> 
> On this version, I'm able to load with bit size 30, 31 gives me error
> regarding allocating memory (64GB host) and anything beyond 31 is
> mysteriously switched to a lower number. The following dmesg on my
> host confirms that the bitsize 30 worked, which is not possible
> without a patch on the current kernel version.
> 
> "[Fri Apr 14 01:14:51 2023] IPVS: Connection hash table configured (size=1073741
> 824, memory=16777216Kbytes)"
> 
> @Julian Anastasov,
> >This is not a limit of number of connections. I prefer
> not to allow value above 24 without adding checks for the
> available memory,
> 
> Interesting that you brought up that number 24, that is exactly what
> we use in production today. One IPVS node is able to handle spikes of
> 10M active connections without issues. This patch idea originated as
> my company is migrating from the ancient RHEL version to a somewhat
> newer CentOS (5.* kernel) and noticed that we were unable to load the
> ip_vs kernel module with anything greater than 20 bits. Another
> motivation for kernel upgrade is utilizing maglev to reduce table size
> but that's out of context in this discussion.
> 
> My request is, can we increase the range from 20 to something larger?
> If 31 seems a bit excessive, maybe, we can settle for something like
> [8,30] or even lower. With conn_tab_bits=30, it allocates 16GB at
> initialization time, it is not entirely absurd by today's standards.
> 
> I can revise my patch to a lower range as you guys see fit.

	Some 32-bit platforms have a 120MB limit for
vmalloc. 24-bit table on 32-bit box will allocate 64MB.

	One way to solve the problem is to use in Kconfig:

range 8 20 if !64BIT
range 8 27 if 64BIT

	Why 30 and above do not work? Because we store the
size, mask in 'int' which is 32 bits. But also some places do not
allow allocations above INT_MAX, for example, kvmalloc_node().
So, even 28 may not work for 8-byte array items on 64-bit.

	It would be good to check if the provided
value does not exceed some real limits. Here is an example
that assumes IPVS will allocate up to 1/8 of the memory,
8 conns average in a hash row. Such checks should not
exceed the small vmalloc area for 32-bit boxes and also
kvmalloc allows vmalloc with huge pages. This idea is
entirely untested/compiled. These checks apply some
sane thresholds. If you need something above, you are
probably allocating more than needed.

/* This will match the Kconfig range: */
int min = 8;
#if __BITS_PER_LONG > 32
int max = 27;
#else
int max = 20;
#endif

	We can safely use 27 in Kconfig even for 32-bit
due to the below checks, they will clamp it to lower value.

	/* Order of the available memory */
	int max_avail = order_base_2(totalram_pages()) + PAGE_SHIFT;

	We can remove this 'if' check:
	if (ip_vs_conn_tab_bits < 8 || ip_vs_conn_tab_bits > 20) {
		pr_info("conn_tab_bits not in [8, 20]. Using default value\n");
		ip_vs_conn_tab_bits = CONFIG_IP_VS_TAB_BITS;
	}

	max_avail -= 3;				/* ~8 in hash row */
	max_avail -= 3;				/* IPVS up to 1/8 of mem */
	/* The hash table links allocated memory for IPVS conns */
	max_avail -= order_base_2(sizeof(struct ip_vs_conn));
	/* Range should not exceed the available memory */
	max = clamp(max, min, max_avail);
	/* Clamp configured value silently */
	ip_vs_conn_tab_bits = clamp_val(ip_vs_conn_tab_bits, min, max);
	ip_vs_conn_tab_size = 1 << ip_vs_conn_tab_bits;
	ip_vs_conn_tab_mask = ip_vs_conn_tab_size - 1;

	/* Switch to kvmalloc */
	ip_vs_conn_tab = kvmalloc_array(ip_vs_conn_tab_size,
					sizeof(*ip_vs_conn_tab), GFP_KERNEL);

	and use everywhere kvfree(ip_vs_conn_tab);

	For 64GB box the calcs should be:

max_avail = 36 - 3 - 3 - 9 => ip_vs_conn_tab_bits = 21
Allocated hash table: (2^21)*8=16MB
Allocated for IPVS conns (8 cols per row): (2^21)*8*(400..512)=6..8GB
which is ~1/8 of 64GB. All memory will be allocated with
~64 conns per row. May be the above calcs can be changed
to ~4 cols and 1/2 mem to use 128MB (24 bits instead of 21)
for our example: 36 - 2 - 1 - 9 => 24.

	Possible problems if using large table that is
not loaded with enough conns:

- walking the table will cost more cycles, for example,
ip_vs_random_dropentry() wants to walk part of the table
every second. Even normal netns cleanup has to walk it.

- cat /proc/net/ip_vs_conn will be slower

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.