Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] sysctl: Add a size argument to register functions in sysctl

Chris Maness <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.lvs-devel,dev.linux.lists.bridge,org.kernel.vger.linux-hams
Message-ID <CANnsUMG3WO_19GpnsNaXPqu6eEnpBvYUpkrf1QbHwsc9wEoCZQ@mail.gmail.com>
When are these likely to hit the mainline release code?

On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 2:59 PM Luis Chamberlain <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 02:36:50PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > Joel Granados (14):
> > >   sysctl: Prefer ctl_table_header in proc_sysctl
> > >   sysctl: Use ctl_table_header in list_for_each_table_entry
> > >   sysctl: Add ctl_table_size to ctl_table_header
> > >   sysctl: Add size argument to init_header
> > >   sysctl: Add a size arg to __register_sysctl_table
> > >   sysctl: Add size to register_sysctl
> > >   sysctl: Add size arg to __register_sysctl_init
> >
> > This is looking great thanks, I've taken the first 7 patches above
> > to sysctl-next to get more exposure / testing and since we're already
> > on rc4.
>
> Ok I havent't heard much more feedback from networking folks, and
> since this is mostly sysctl love I've taken in the rest of these
> patches. Thanks to Jani Nikula for the reviews and to Greg KH for
> the suggestion on simplifying things.
>
> Let's see what busts in linux-next, and if anything does I can reset
> my tree back to only the first 7 patches.
>
>   Luis
>
-- 
Thanks,
Chris Maness
-Sent from my iPhone
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.