[PATCH] ipvs: Fix checksumming on GSO of SCTP packets

Ismael Luceno <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.lvs-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.netfilter-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It was observed in the wild that pairs of consecutive packets would leave
the IPVS with the same wrong checksum, and the issue only went away when
disabling GSO.

IPVS needs to avoid computing the SCTP checksum when using GSO.

Co-developed-by: Firo Yang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Andreas Taschner <[email protected]>
CC: Michal Kubeček <[email protected]>
CC: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
CC: Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
---
 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
index a0921adc31a9..3205b45ce161 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
@@ -126,7 +126,8 @@ sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
 	if (sctph->source != cp->vport || payload_csum ||
 	    skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
 		sctph->source = cp->vport;
-		sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
+		if (!skb_is_gso_sctp(skb))
+			sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
 	} else {
 		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
 	}
@@ -174,7 +175,8 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
 	    (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL &&
 	     !(skb_dst(skb)->dev->features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC))) {
 		sctph->dest = cp->dport;
-		sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
+		if (!skb_is_gso_sctp(skb))
+			sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
 	} else if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
 		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
 	}
-- 
2.43.0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.