[PATCH v3 09/11] ipvs: constify ctl_table arguments of utility functions

Thomas Weißschuh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.lvs-devel,dev.linux.lists.bridge,org.infradead.lists.kexec,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-hardening,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.kernel.vger.linux-rdma,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-sctp,org.kernel.vger.linux-security-module,org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.netfilter-devel,org.kvack.linux-mm,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In a future commit the proc_handlers themselves will change to
"const struct ctl_table". As a preparation for that adapt the internal
helpers.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <[email protected]>
---
 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
index 143a341bbc0a..689ac521ea2d 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
@@ -1924,7 +1924,8 @@ proc_do_sync_ports(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static int ipvs_proc_est_cpumask_set(struct ctl_table *table, void *buffer)
+static int ipvs_proc_est_cpumask_set(const struct ctl_table *table,
+				     void *buffer)
 {
 	struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = table->extra2;
 	cpumask_var_t *valp = table->data;
@@ -1962,8 +1963,8 @@ static int ipvs_proc_est_cpumask_set(struct ctl_table *table, void *buffer)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int ipvs_proc_est_cpumask_get(struct ctl_table *table, void *buffer,
-				     size_t size)
+static int ipvs_proc_est_cpumask_get(const struct ctl_table *table,
+				     void *buffer, size_t size)
 {
 	struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = table->extra2;
 	cpumask_var_t *valp = table->data;

-- 
2.44.0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.