Re: [PATCH v3] ipvs: Fix checksumming on GSO of SCTP packets

Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.lvs-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.netfilter-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
	Hello,

On Thu, 25 Apr 2024, Ismael Luceno wrote:

> It was observed in the wild that pairs of consecutive packets would leave
> the IPVS with the same wrong checksum, and the issue only went away when
> disabling GSO.
> 
> IPVS needs to avoid computing the SCTP checksum when using GSO.
> 
> Fixes: 90017accff61 ("sctp: Add GSO support", 2016-06-02)
> Co-developed-by: Firo Yang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Andreas Taschner <[email protected]>
> CC: Michal Kubeček <[email protected]>
> CC: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> CC: Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>
> CC: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     Changes since v2:
>     * Use only skb_is_gso, no need to check for GSO type

	v2 is already applied. I acked it because sctp_gso_segment()
checks for skb_is_gso_sctp(). If v3 is just an optimization
better to live with v2? Is it possible to see skb_is_gso() but
not skb_is_gso_sctp() while working with SCTP packet?

>     Changes since v1:
>     * Added skb_is_gso before skb_is_gso_sctp.
>     * Added "Fixes" tag.
> 
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> index a0921adc31a9..83e452916403 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> @@ -126,7 +126,8 @@ sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>  	if (sctph->source != cp->vport || payload_csum ||
>  	    skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
>  		sctph->source = cp->vport;
> -		sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
> +		if (!skb_is_gso(skb))
> +			sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
>  	} else {
>  		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>  	}
> @@ -174,7 +175,8 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>  	    (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL &&
>  	     !(skb_dst(skb)->dev->features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC))) {
>  		sctph->dest = cp->dport;
> -		sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
> +		if (!skb_is_gso(skb))
> +			sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
>  	} else if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
>  		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.43.0

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.