Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] sysctl: treewide: constify ctl_table argument of sysctl handlers
Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.lvs-devel,dev.linux.lists.bridge,org.infradead.lists.kexec,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-hardening,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.kernel.vger.linux-rdma,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-sctp,org.kernel.vger.linux-security-module,org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.netfilter-devel,org.kvack.linux-mm,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 8 May 2024 10:11:35 -0700 Kees Cook wrote: > > Split this per subsystem, please. > > I've done a few painful API transitions before, and I don't think the > complexity of these changes needs a per-subsystem constification pass. I > think this series is the right approach, but that patch 11 will need > coordination with Linus. We regularly do system-wide prototype changes > like this right at the end of the merge window before -rc1 comes out. Right. I didn't read the code closely enough before responding. Chalk my response up to being annoyed by the constant stream of cross-tree changes in procfs without proper cover letter explaining how they will be merged :|