Re: [GIT PULL] sysctl constification changes for v6.11-rc1
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.lvs-devel,dev.linux.lists.bridge,dev.linux.lists.mptcp,org.infradead.lists.kexec,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-hardening,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.kernel.vger.linux-rdma,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-sctp,org.kernel.vger.linux-security-module,org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.netfilter-devel,org.kvack.linux-mm,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHk-=wiHHDGQ03qJc+yZKmUpmKOgbz26Tq=XBrYcmNww8L_V0A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 14:00, Joel Granados <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is my first time sending out a semantic patch, so get back to me if > you have issues or prefer some other way of receiving it. Looks fine to me. Sometimes if it's just a pure scripting change, people send me the script itself and just ask me to run it as a final thing before the rc1 release or something like that. But since in practice there's almost always some additional manual cleanup, doing it this way with the script documented in the commit is typically the right way to go. This time it was details like whitespace alignment, sometimes it's "the script did 95%, but there was another call site that also needed updating", or just a documentation update to go in together with the change or whatever. Anyway, pulled and just going through my build tests now. Linus