Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] ipvs: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_long_wq

Marco Crivellari <[email protected]> wrote:
> This patch continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which has begun
> with the changes introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
> 
>    commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
>    commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
> 
> The point of the refactoring is to eventually alter the default behavior of
> workqueues to become unbound by default so that their workload placement is
> optimized by the scheduler.
> 
> Before that to happen, workqueue users must be converted to the better named
> new workqueues with no intended behaviour changes:
> 
>    system_wq -> system_percpu_wq
>    system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq
> 
> This way the old obsolete workqueues (system_wq, system_unbound_wq) can be
> removed in the future.
> 
> This specific work is considered long, so enqueue it using
> system_dfl_long_wq instead of system_dfl_wq.

While 5522d65d81a7 ("ipvs: avoid possible loop in ip_vs_dst_event on resizing")
is now in nf-next, this patch doesn't apply (anymore):

git am -s v2-net-next-2-2-ipvs-Replace-use-of-system_unbound_wq-with-system_dfl_long_wq.patch
Applying: ipvs: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_long_wq
error: patch failed: net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:800
error: net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 ipvs: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_long_wq

Would you mind sending a new version? Thanks.