[to-be-updated] mm-vmscan-drop-unused-gfp_mask-parameter-from-__node_reclaim.patch removed from -mm tree
Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.mm-commits |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm: vmscan: drop unused gfp_mask parameter from __node_reclaim()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-vmscan-drop-unused-gfp_mask-parameter-from-__node_reclaim.patch
This patch was dropped because an updated version will be issued
------------------------------------------------------
From: Ridong Chen <[email protected]>
Subject: mm: vmscan: drop unused gfp_mask parameter from __node_reclaim()
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:33:00 +0800
Commit 57972c78e678 ("mm/vmscan: make __node_reclaim() more generic")
moved the scan_control construction out to the callers and passed the
struct in by pointer. After that change every use of the gfp mask inside
__node_reclaim() goes through sc->gfp_mask, leaving the gfp_mask parameter
unused. Just remove the dead parameter and update the callers
accordingly. No functional change.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Qi Zheng <[email protected]>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <[email protected]>
Cc: Barry Song <[email protected]>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>
Cc: Kairui Song <[email protected]>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <[email protected]>
Cc: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
Cc: Yuanchu Xie <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhongkun He <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-drop-unused-gfp_mask-parameter-from-__node_reclaim
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -7732,7 +7732,7 @@ static unsigned long node_pagecache_recl
/*
* Try to free up some pages from this node through reclaim.
*/
-static unsigned long __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask,
+static unsigned long __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
unsigned long nr_pages,
struct scan_control *sc)
{
@@ -7824,7 +7824,7 @@ unsigned long node_reclaim(struct pglist
if (test_and_set_bit_lock(PGDAT_RECLAIM_LOCKED, &pgdat->flags))
return 0;
- ret = __node_reclaim(pgdat, gfp_mask, nr_pages, &sc);
+ ret = __node_reclaim(pgdat, nr_pages, &sc);
clear_bit_unlock(PGDAT_RECLAIM_LOCKED, &pgdat->flags);
if (ret >= nr_pages)
@@ -7837,7 +7837,7 @@ unsigned long node_reclaim(struct pglist
#else
-static unsigned long __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask,
+static unsigned long __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
unsigned long nr_pages,
struct scan_control *sc)
{
@@ -7950,8 +7950,7 @@ int user_proactive_reclaim(char *buf,
&pgdat->flags))
return -EBUSY;
- reclaimed = __node_reclaim(pgdat, gfp_mask,
- batch_size, &sc);
+ reclaimed = __node_reclaim(pgdat, batch_size, &sc);
clear_bit_unlock(PGDAT_RECLAIM_LOCKED, &pgdat->flags);
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are
memcg-move-mem_cgroup_swappiness-and-vm_swappiness-to-mm-swaph.patch
mm-vmscan-fix-node-reclaim-ignoring-swappiness-parameter.patch