[merged mm-nonmm-stable] signal-avoid-unconditional-siginfo-copy-in-send_signal_locked.patch removed from -mm tree

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Mon, 03 Aug 2026 21:04:51 -0700
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.mm-commits
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The quilt patch titled
     Subject: signal: avoid unconditional siginfo copy in send_signal_locked()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     signal-avoid-unconditional-siginfo-copy-in-send_signal_locked.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-nonmm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Subject: signal: avoid unconditional siginfo copy in send_signal_locked()
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2026 16:34:42 +0200

send_signal_locked() unconditionally copies siginfo before the namespace
translation to avoid corrupting a shared siginfo.

Not that I think this can actually hurt performance-wise, just it doesn't
look clean to me; the copy is only needed in the unlikely case when the
translation will actually change something.

Defer it to the two cases where si_pid/si_uid are rewritten, and while at
it add #ifdef's just for completeness.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Biederman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---

 kernel/signal.c |   23 +++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/signal.c~signal-avoid-unconditional-siginfo-copy-in-send_signal_locked
+++ a/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ static inline bool has_si_pid_and_uid(st
 int send_signal_locked(int sig, struct kernel_siginfo *info,
 		       struct task_struct *t, enum pid_type type)
 {
-	struct kernel_siginfo rewritten;
+	struct kernel_siginfo __maybe_unused rewritten;
 	/* Should SIGKILL or SIGSTOP be received by a pid namespace init? */
 	bool force = false;
 
@@ -1193,27 +1193,34 @@ int send_signal_locked(int sig, struct k
 		force = true;
 	} else if (has_si_pid_and_uid(info)) {
 		/* SIGKILL and SIGSTOP is special or has ids */
+#ifdef CONFIG_USER_NS
 		struct user_namespace *t_user_ns;
-
-		rewritten = *info;
-		info = &rewritten;
+		kuid_t uid;
 
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		t_user_ns = task_cred_xxx(t, user_ns);
 		if (current_user_ns() != t_user_ns) {
-			kuid_t uid = make_kuid(current_user_ns(), info->si_uid);
-			info->si_uid = from_kuid_munged(t_user_ns, uid);
+			rewritten = *info;
+			info = &rewritten;
+			uid = make_kuid(current_user_ns(), info->si_uid);
+			rewritten.si_uid = from_kuid_munged(t_user_ns, uid);
 		}
 		rcu_read_unlock();
-
+#endif
 		/* A kernel generated signal? */
 		force = (info->si_code == SI_KERNEL);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
 		/* From an ancestor pid namespace? */
 		if (!task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(t))) {
-			info->si_pid = 0;
+			if (info != &rewritten) {
+				rewritten = *info;
+				info = &rewritten;
+			}
+			rewritten.si_pid = 0;
 			force = true;
 		}
+#endif
 	}
 	return __send_signal_locked(sig, info, t, type, force);
 }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are