Re: [PATCH v1 net-next] af_unix: Unlink scc_entry in unix_del_edge().
Kyle Zeng <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 17:39:02 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <anE0pkuSdq6ilu7V@com-75606> |
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 12:21:54AM +0000, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> Kyle Zeng reported that GC could free a dead SCC partially.
>
> The scenario is as follows:
>
> 1) Create two SCCs:
>
> X -. A <-> B
> ^--'
>
> 2) Run the following concurrently:
>
> 2-1) send() sk-B to sk-B from sk-X
> 2-2) close() both A and B
>
> At 2-1), there is a small window where unix_add_edges()
> publishes a new edge (B <-> B) to GC but its skb is not queued
> by skb_queue_tail().
>
> If 2-2) completes before skb_queue_tail() and GC is triggered,
> it judges A <-> B as dead, but B is not freed because GC cannot
> collect the not-yet-queued skb holding the B <-> B edge.
>
> X -. A <-> B -. This edge is visible
> ^--' ^..' but skb is not
>
> This itself is not a problem since the next GC run will judge
> B as dead as well and free it finally.
>
> X -. A <.> B -.
> ^--' ^--'
>
> However, X's SCC forces the next GC to call unix_walk_scc_fast(),
> and it iterates over A through B's scc_entry.
>
> Let's unlink scc_entry before freeing the vertex in unix_del_edge().
>
> Fixes: 4090fa373f0e ("af_unix: Replace garbage collection algorithm.")
> Reported-by: Kyle Zeng <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/unix/garbage.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/unix/garbage.c b/net/unix/garbage.c
> index 0783555e2526..9fcaaf55cba5 100644
> --- a/net/unix/garbage.c
> +++ b/net/unix/garbage.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ static void unix_del_edge(struct scm_fp_list *fpl, struct unix_edge *edge)
> if (!vertex->out_degree) {
> edge->predecessor->vertex = NULL;
> list_move_tail(&vertex->entry, &fpl->vertices);
> + list_del(&vertex->scc_entry);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.55.0.571.g244d577d93-goog
>
Reviewed-by: Kyle Zeng <[email protected]>