Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] binder: Make shrinker rely solely on per-VMA lock
Carlos Llamas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 06:32:15PM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 01:05:45PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> > > > > tl;dr: lock_vma_under_rcu() is already a trylock. No need to do both > > it and mmap_read_trylock(). > > > > Long Version: > > > > == Background == > > > > Historically, binder used an mmap_read_trylock() in its shrinker code. > > This ensures that reclaim is not blocked on an mmap_lock. Commit > > 95bc2d4a9020 ("binder: use per-vma lock in page reclaiming") added > > support for the per-VMA lock, but left mmap_read_trylock() as a > > fallback. > > > > This was presumably because the per-VMA locking can fail for several > > reasons and most (all?) lock_vma_under_rcu() callers have a fallback > > to mmap_read_trylock(). > > > > == Problem == > > > > The fallback is not worth the complexity here. lock_vma_under_rcu() is > > essentially already a non-blocking trylock. The main reason it fails > > is also the reason mmap_read_trylock() fails: something is holding > > mmap_write_lock(). > > > > The only remedy for a collision with mmap_write_lock() is to wait, > > which this code can not do. So the "fallback" after > > lock_vma_under_rcu() failure is not really a fallback: it is really > > likely to just be retrying in vain. That retry in an of itself isn't > > horrible. But it adds complexity. > > > > == Solution == > > > > Now that per-VMA locks are universally available, lock_vma_under_rcu() > > will not persistently fail. Rely on it alone and simplify the code. > > The removal of the fallback does not affect NOMMU case because binder > > driver depends on CONFIG_MMU. > > > > Full disclosure: I originally tried to do this with > > lock_vma_under_rcu_wait(), but it did not fit well with the mmap_lock > > trylock semantics. Claude caught this in a review and suggested the > > approach in this path. It seemed sane to me. So, Suggesed-by: Claude, > > I guess. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > > Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <[email protected]> > > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> > > Cc: Shakeel Butt <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> > > Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <[email protected]> > > Cc: Todd Kjos <[email protected]> > > Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]> > > Cc: Carlos Llamas <[email protected]> > > Cc: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]> > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> > > Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > --- FWIW, I think we should just simply do the following: --- diff --git a/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c b/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c index e4488ad86a65..b0b618c1d1da 100644 --- a/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c +++ b/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c @@ -1142,7 +1142,6 @@ enum lru_status binder_alloc_free_page(struct list_head *item, struct vm_area_struct *vma; struct page *page_to_free; unsigned long page_addr; - int mm_locked = 0; size_t index; if (!mmget_not_zero(mm)) @@ -1153,13 +1152,8 @@ enum lru_status binder_alloc_free_page(struct list_head *item, /* attempt per-vma lock first */ vma = lock_vma_under_rcu(mm, page_addr); - if (!vma) { - /* fall back to mmap_lock */ - if (!mmap_read_trylock(mm)) - goto err_mmap_read_lock_failed; - mm_locked = 1; - vma = vma_lookup(mm, page_addr); - } + if (!vma) + goto err_vma_lock_failed; if (!mutex_trylock(&alloc->mutex)) goto err_get_alloc_mutex_failed; @@ -1191,10 +1185,7 @@ enum lru_status binder_alloc_free_page(struct list_head *item, } mutex_unlock(&alloc->mutex); - if (mm_locked) - mmap_read_unlock(mm); - else - vma_end_read(vma); + vma_end_read(vma); mmput_async(mm); binder_free_page(page_to_free); @@ -1203,11 +1194,8 @@ enum lru_status binder_alloc_free_page(struct list_head *item, err_invalid_vma: mutex_unlock(&alloc->mutex); err_get_alloc_mutex_failed: - if (mm_locked) - mmap_read_unlock(mm); - else - vma_end_read(vma); -err_mmap_read_lock_failed: + vma_end_read(vma); +err_vma_lock_failed: mmput_async(mm); err_mmget: return LRU_SKIP;