Re: [PATCH net 1/1] ipv4: reject RTAX_MTU values below IPV4_MIN_MTU
Yong Wang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
在 2026/8/12 20:08, Ido Schimmel 写道: > On Sat, Aug 08, 2026 at 04:01:15PM +0800, Ren Wei wrote: >> From: Yong Wang <[email protected]> >> >> ip_metrics_convert() caps RTAX_MTU at the IPv4 maximum, but it still >> accepts undersized non-zero values from userspace. >> >> A route installed with "mtu lock 20" can later reach the IPv4 >> forwarding fragmentation path. With a normal 20-byte IPv4 header, >> ip_do_fragment() reduces the payload MTU to zero. ip_frag_next() then >> keeps producing zero-length payload fragments, so the fragmentation >> state never makes forward progress and the kernel loops until the >> softlockup detector fires. >> >> Reject non-zero RTAX_MTU values smaller than IPV4_MIN_MTU while keeping >> the existing "0 means use default MTU" behavior intact. >> >> This fixes the bug at the route metric input point and avoids adding >> redundant checks in the fragmentation path. > > Sashiko is correct that this is also reproducible without setting an MTU > lock. See [1]. > > Better to fix it in ip_do_fragment(), in a similar fashion to IPv6. > Something like [2]. > > Sashiko review: > > https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/ccd14fb1411b8b9c466065582e43f6a6c0743842.1786094799.git.edragain%40163.com > > And please note: > > "Patch authors are expected to proactively look into the AI-generated > reviews and handle such feedback as any other kind of review: either > debate it or address it. In both cases a reply on the mailing list is > expected." > > https://docs.kernel.org/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#review-timelines > > [1] > #!/bin/bash > > sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 > > ip link add name dummy1 up mtu 20 type dummy > ip address add 192.0.2.1/24 dev dummy1 > > ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 > ip addr add 198.51.100.1/24 dev veth0 > ip link set veth0 up > > ip netns add ns1 > ip link set veth1 netns ns1 > ip -n ns1 address add 198.51.100.2/24 dev veth1 > ip -n ns1 link set veth1 up > ip -n ns1 route add default via 198.51.100.1 > ip netns exec ns1 ping -M dont -s 1000 -c 1 192.0.2.2 > > [2] > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c > index e6dd1e5b8c32..e6bbae103e4f 100644 > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c > @@ -790,6 +790,12 @@ int ip_do_fragment(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, > */ > > hlen = iph->ihl * 4; > + > + if (mtu < hlen + 8) { > + err = -EMSGSIZE; > + goto fail; > + } > + > mtu = mtu - hlen; /* Size of data space */ > IPCB(skb)->flags |= IPSKB_FRAG_COMPLETE; > ll_rs = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(rt->dst.dev); Thanks for the review. I checked the Sashiko feedback and reproduced the issue without route MTU lock as well, using only a 20-byte MTU on the egress dummy device. So the metrics side validation is not sufficient. I moved the fix to ip_do_fragment(), adding a direct mtu < hlen + 8 check there. I also verified that the old kernel still reproduces the softlockup in the no-mtu-lock case, while the updated kernel no longer gets stuck. I will resend with that version.