Re: [RFC net-next 1/6] psp: steer Rx queues with the virtualization cookie
"Daniel Zahka" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat Aug 22, 2026 at 6:55 PM EDT, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> @@ -72,6 +90,27 @@ name: psp
> Present when in associated namespace, absent when in primary/host
> namespace.
> type: flag
> + -
> + name: vc-steer-cap
> + doc: |
> + Device can steer received traffic on the PSP virtualization
> + cookie (VC). The VC is split into a 32b reserved part, a 16b
> + queue ID the sender is asking the peer to send to, and a 16b
> + queue ID granting the peer's own request. Steering installs low
> + priority rules matching the latter, which win over the RSS table
> + result. Only needed for the rx direction; granting a peer's
> + request is just header generation and needs no device support.
> + type: flag
> + -
> + name: vc-steer-ena
> + doc: |
> + Directions taking part in VC based queue steering. Leave the
> + attribute out of a dev-set request to keep the current setting.
> + Applies to associations created from then on, existing ones keep
> + the setting they were created with.
> + type: u32
> + enum: vc-steer
> + enum-as-flags: true
>
Should vc-steer-ena be a connection level setting? Maybe it could go
into rx-assoc. The way it's implemented here, the state is already per
assoc.
> +Every driver has to carry the cookie, not just those which advertise
> +``vc-steer-cap`` - granting a peer's request needs no help from the
> +device, so the ``tx`` direction of ``vc-steer-ena`` may be turned on
> +anywhere. Drivers must ask ``psp_assoc_vc_tx_get()`` for the cookie to
> +place in the Tx header, and report the queue IDs a received cookie held
> +in ``psp_skb_ext.vc_req`` and ``vc_dst`` (``psp_dev_rcv()`` does this for
> +drivers which let the core strip the headers). Reporting is what allows
> +the core to grant the peer's request. The steering itself is only
> +expected of drivers which advertise ``vc-steer-cap``.
> +
> +When VC steering is enabled GRO implementations are allowed to ignore
> +changes in the cookie for transport mode PSP.
> +
Makes sense. Do we would need to update __psp_skb_coalesce_diff() here
then for the sw gro?
> struct psp_assoc {
> struct psp_dev *psd;
>
> @@ -159,6 +233,23 @@ struct psp_assoc {
> u8 generation;
> u8 version;
> u8 peer_tx;
> + /* enum psp_assoc_flags. Written under psd->lock, additionally read
> + * on the Tx fast path without it. A snapshot of the device config
> + * taken when the association was created, so that the header size,
> + * and with it the MSS, cannot change under an established
> + * connection.
> + */
> + u8 flags;
> +
> + /* Queue IDs for the VC, ours and the peer's. @vc_loc is refreshed
> + * from the Tx queue selection and goes out as the cookie's request,
> + * @vc_rem is learned from the peer's requests and goes back out as
> + * the destination. Both are PSP_VC_QID_NONE until something is
> + * learned. Written without the socket lock, always use
> + * READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE().
> + */
> + u16 vc_loc;
> + u16 vc_rem;
>
Unrelated, but this reminds me: some of the other fields here:
generation, spi, peer_tx, have some reads/writes that probably require
READ/WRITE_ONCE() and maybe deserve a similar comment here... Probably
all bugs that I introduced :/
> /* Encapsulate a TCP packet with PSP by adding the UDP+PSP headers and filling
> - * them in.
> + * them in. @vc is the virtualization cookie to place in the header, 0 for
> + * a header with no optional fields.
> */
> bool psp_dev_encapsulate(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 spi,
> - u8 ver, __be16 sport)
> + u8 ver, __be16 sport, u64 vc)
> {
> u32 network_len = skb_network_header_len(skb);
> u32 ethr_len = skb_mac_header_len(skb);
> u32 bufflen = ethr_len + network_len;
> + u32 encap_len = PSP_ENCAP_HLEN;
>
> if (skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
> skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IPV6))
> return false;
>
> - if (skb_cow_head(skb, PSP_ENCAP_HLEN))
> + if (vc)
> + encap_len += PSP_VC_SIZE;
> +
I suppose vc of 0 is probably valid. We might need something else to
disambiguate "not present".