my summary of LLM judgement in this PR [was Re: [PATCH net 01/10] netfilter: flowtable: publish HW_DEAD after worker is done]

Hi Jakub,

I will be posting a v2 of this PR in a few minutes.

LLM found one real issue in the last, it also refer to two
pre-existing issues that I can address.

One of the reported pre-existing issues in nfnetlink_queue, Florian
hesitates if it is theoretical.

Julian also wants to send a v2 for its IPVS patch to ... write a
better commit description to please the LLM, it seems.

In summary, one real issue in this PR I would say, which is my fault
because I misguided the patch submitter.

I'm sure these tools can help us get things better, I understand too
we have to try them all so we can evaluate. But I'm starting to wonder
if it is worth stalling the pipeline and retrigger a PR continuosly,
when we can follow up for those that we deem to be addressed.

Thanks.