Re: [PATCH 7/7] future/formalregress: Use SEL4 consistently

"Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.perfbook
Message-ID <6e4f4019-ce9c-481f-b8bb-c352aa4658fa@paulmck-laptop>
On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 01:32:09PM -0800, SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 11:29:45 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 09:26:14AM -0800, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > formalregress.tex is using mixed use of SEL4 and seL4.  SEL4 is used 8
> > > times, while seL4 is used twice over the entire repository.  Use SEL4
> > > for the consistency.  Note that use of seL4 in swtools.bib is not
> > > changed by this commit.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Nice, thank you!
> 
> You're very welcome, Paul!
> 
> > 
> > I queued and pushed all but this one.  Their website [1] says seL4.
> > At least I *think* that this is their website.
> 
> Agreed :)
> 
> > 
> > Either way, I agree that this should be consistent with their naming.
> 
> Sure, I will send a new revision soon.
> 
> > 
> > On the Promela/spin change, should a similar change be applied in the
> > Formal Verification chapter?
> 
> I already finished the translation of the chapter, but hopefully I will revisit
> it soon :)  Don't wait for me, though!

Fair enough!  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> SJ
> 
> > 
> > 							Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > [1] https://sel4.systems/
> > 
> > > ---
> > >  future/formalregress.tex | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/future/formalregress.tex b/future/formalregress.tex
> > > index b1a39b29..40bf2b35 100644
> > > --- a/future/formalregress.tex
> > > +++ b/future/formalregress.tex
> > > @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ so they are all yellow with question marks.
> > >  	Indeed there are!
> > >  	This table focuses on those that Paul has used, but others are
> > >  	proving to be useful.
> > > -	Formal verification has been heavily used in the seL4
> > > +	Formal verification has been heavily used in the SEL4
> > >  	project~\cite{ThomasSewell2013L4binaryVerification},
> > >  	and its tools can now handle modest levels of concurrency.
> > >  	More recently, Catalin Marinas used Lamport's
> > > -- 
> > > 2.17.1
> > > 
> > >
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.