Re: [PATCH -perfbook] cpu: make Quick Quiz 3.6 more explicit

On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 11:55:00AM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Zhouyi Zhou <[email protected]>
> 
> Rewrite Quick Quiz 3.6 for clarity and explicitness, so that the
> firsttime reader know that another choice is CPU 0 sharing a core
> with CPU 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou<[email protected]>
> ---
> hi Paul and Akira
> 
> This minor fix is also reported by our Chinese version editor
> Yunjing Li.

I have pulled this in, thanks to both you and the editor!  Would it be
appropriate to have the editor's reported-by?  (I trust your judgment
on this.  I am only asking, not in any way suggesting a change.)

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks
> Zhouyi
> --
>  cpu/overheads.tex | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/cpu/overheads.tex b/cpu/overheads.tex
> index 1ee9c52f..a2ec2998 100644
> --- a/cpu/overheads.tex
> +++ b/cpu/overheads.tex
> @@ -262,7 +262,8 @@ CAS and lock, respectively.
>  \QuickQuiz{
>  	\Cref{tab:cpu:CPU 0 View of Synchronization Mechanisms on 8-Socket System With Intel Xeon Platinum 8176 CPUs at 2.10GHz}
>  	shows CPU~0 sharing a core with CPU~224.
> -	Shouldn't that instead be CPU~1???
> +	However, isn't it more logical for CPU 0
> +	to share a core with CPU 1 instead of CPU 224???
>  }\QuickQuizAnswer{
>  	It is easy to be sympathetic to this view, but the file
>  	\path{/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index0/shared_cpu_list}
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>