[RFC PATCH 1/1] SMPdesign: Fix a typo

philophers -> philosophers

Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <[email protected]>
---
Re-reading, found a typo accidentally. :)

 SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex b/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
index 246182c2..0d94ec3a 100644
--- a/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
+++ b/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
@@ -19,21 +19,21 @@ The word ``design'' is very important:
 You should partition first, batch second, weaken third, and code fourth.
 Changing this order often leads to poor performance and scalability
 along with great frustration.\footnote{
 	That other great dodge around the Laws of Physics, read-only
 	replication, is covered in \cref{chp:Deferred Processing}.}
 
 This chapter will also look at some specific problems, including:
 
 \begin{enumerate}
 \item	Constraints on the classic Dining Philosophers problem requiring
-	that all the philophers be able to dine concurrently.
+	that all the philosophers be able to dine concurrently.
 \label{sec:SMPdesign:Problems Dining Philosophers}
 \item	Lock-based double-ended queue implementations that provide
 	concurrency between operations on both ends of a given queue
 	when there are many elements in the queue, but still work
 	correctly when the queue contains only a few elements.
 	(Or, for that matter, no elements.)
 \label{sec:SMPdesign:Problems Double-Ended Queue}
 \item	Summarizing the rough quality of a concurrent algorithm with only
 	a few numbers.
 \label{sec:SMPdesign:Problems Quality Assessment}
-- 
2.53.0