Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] SMPdesign: Fix a typo

On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 11:14:24PM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> philophers -> philosophers
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <[email protected]>
> ---
> Re-reading, found a typo accidentally. :)

;-) ;-) ;-)

Good eyes, applied, and thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

>  SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex b/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
> index 246182c2..0d94ec3a 100644
> --- a/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
> +++ b/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
> @@ -19,21 +19,21 @@ The word ``design'' is very important:
>  You should partition first, batch second, weaken third, and code fourth.
>  Changing this order often leads to poor performance and scalability
>  along with great frustration.\footnote{
>  	That other great dodge around the Laws of Physics, read-only
>  	replication, is covered in \cref{chp:Deferred Processing}.}
>  
>  This chapter will also look at some specific problems, including:
>  
>  \begin{enumerate}
>  \item	Constraints on the classic Dining Philosophers problem requiring
> -	that all the philophers be able to dine concurrently.
> +	that all the philosophers be able to dine concurrently.
>  \label{sec:SMPdesign:Problems Dining Philosophers}
>  \item	Lock-based double-ended queue implementations that provide
>  	concurrency between operations on both ends of a given queue
>  	when there are many elements in the queue, but still work
>  	correctly when the queue contains only a few elements.
>  	(Or, for that matter, no elements.)
>  \label{sec:SMPdesign:Problems Double-Ended Queue}
>  \item	Summarizing the rough quality of a concurrent algorithm with only
>  	a few numbers.
>  \label{sec:SMPdesign:Problems Quality Assessment}
> -- 
> 2.53.0
>