Re: [DONOTAPPLY RFC PATCH v2 0/4] WiFi support for samsung,coreprimevelte

Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.phone-devel,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless
Message-ID <20260429134011.GA73482@francesco-nb>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 03:20:28PM +0200, Karel Balej wrote:
> Francesco Dolcini, 2026-04-29T13:22:32+02:00:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 12:55:23PM +0200, Karel Balej wrote:
> >> without the firmware being in linux-firmware?
> >
> > What's the license of this firmware? Am I wrong saying that if
> > the license allows it, you could just send a patch to have it integrated
> > to the linux-firmware repository? Is there any history or documentation
> > on the topic (please apologize if this is a well known topic, just
> > answer RTFM if this is the case).
> 
> that's one of the issues, the license is not specified explicitly
> anywhere as far as I know.
That's enough to be blocked.

> As far as I know, even if I was to submit the firmware myself, it would
> still require a sign-off from someone from NXP [1].

And this is clearly there to avoid situation that are problematic from
a legal point of view.

I do not see any way forward without NXP.

Francesco

> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/about/#signed-off-by-requirement
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.