Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Novatek NT37705

Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.phone-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 04/05/2026 22:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/05/2026 15:36, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> Hi Conor,
>>
>> On Fri May 1, 2026 at 5:51 PM CEST, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 01, 2026 at 03:52:45PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>> Novatek NT37705 is a display driver IC used to drive AMOLED DSI panels.
>>>>
>>>> Describe it and the panel in the Fairphone (Gen. 6) (BJ631JHM-T71-D900
>>>> from BOE) using it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../bindings/display/panel/novatek,nt37705.yaml    | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/novatek,nt37705.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/novatek,nt37705.yaml
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..1c796599f6fc
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/novatek,nt37705.yaml
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>>> +---
>>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/panel/novatek,nt37705.yaml#
>>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>> +
>>>> +title: Novatek NT37705-based DSI display panels
>>>> +
>>>> +maintainers:
>>>> +  - Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
>>>> +
>>>> +description:
>>>> +  The Novatek NT37705 is a generic DSI Panel IC used to control AMOLED panels.
>>>> +
>>>> +allOf:
>>>> +  - $ref: panel-common.yaml#
>>>> +
>>>> +properties:
>>>> +  compatible:
>>>> +    contains:
>>>> +      const: boe,bj631jhm-t71-d900
>>>
>>> Compatible doesn't match the filename, nor does the commit message match
>>> what you've got here. Sounds like you're missing a fallback to
>>> $filename.
>>
>> The last times I was upstreaming panel drivers (Feb 2024 and June 2025),
>> this was the requested way of doing things.
> 
> So this was requested that time and is requested now. What is here
> uncertain?
> 
>>
>> Compatible being the company and model number making the actual panel
>> assembly (driver IC + touchscreen + glass etc), while the rest being
>> named after the driver IC manufacturer & number.
> 
> So exactly what was asked for...

Assuming "the rest" you mean the fallback. Just to remind - we talk here
about the bindings, not drivers.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.